Annals of Internal Medicine· 2014Q1
Mahalle Sosyoekonomik Dezavantajı ve 30 Günlük Yeniden Hastaneye Yatış
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Rehospitalization
- 1.362atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2014yıl
Kısa özet
ABD'nin en dezavantajlı %15'lik mahallelerinde yaşamak, daha az dezavantajlı bölgelere kıyasla 30 günlük yeniden hastaneye yatış riskini %9 (ayarlanmış risk oranı 1.09) artırmaktadır; bu risk kronik akciğer hastalığına benzerdir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- En az dezavantajlı mahallelerin %85'inde 30 günlük yeniden hastaneye yatış oranları anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir (ortalama %21).
- En dezavantajlı mahallelerin %15'inde, dezavantajın kötüleşmesiyle yeniden hastaneye yatış oranları %22'den %27'ye yükselmiştir.
- En dezavantajlı mahalleler, 30 günlük yeniden hastaneye yatış için 1.09'luk ayarlanmış risk oranı göstermiştir.
- Bu yeniden hastaneye yatış riski, kronik akciğer hastalığı (ARR 1.06) ile benzer ve komplikasyonsuz diyabetten (ARR 0.95) daha yüksektir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Measures of socioeconomic disadvantage may enable improved targeting of programs to prevent rehospitalizations, but obtaining such information directly from patients can be difficult. Measures of U.S. neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage are more readily available but are rarely used clinically. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage at the census block group level, as measured by the Singh validated area deprivation index (ADI), and 30-day rehospitalization. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: Random 5% national sample of Medicare patients discharged with congestive heart failure, pneumonia, or myocardial infarction between 2004 and 2009 (n = 255,744). MEASUREMENTS: Medicare data were linked to 2000 census data to construct an ADI for each patient's census block group, which were then sorted into percentiles by increasing ADI. Relationships between neighborhood ADI grouping and 30-day rehospitalization were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models, controlling for patient sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid conditions and severity, and index hospital characteristics. RESULTS: The 30-day rehospitalization rate did not vary significantly across the least disadvantaged 85% of neighborhoods, which had an average rehospitalization rate of 21%. However, within the most disadvantaged 15% of neighborhoods, rehospitalization rates increased from 22% to 27% with worsening ADI. This relationship persisted after full adjustment, with the most disadvantaged neighborhoods having a rehospitalization risk (adjusted risk ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.12]) similar to that of chronic pulmonary disease (adjusted risk ratio, 1.06 [CI, 1.04 to 1.08]) and greater than that of uncomplicated diabetes (adjusted risk ratio, 0.95 [CI, 0.94 to 0.97]). LIMITATION: No direct markers of care quality or access. CONCLUSION: Residence within a disadvantaged U.S. neighborhood is a rehospitalization predictor of magnitude similar to chronic pulmonary disease. Measures of neighborhood disadvantage, such as the ADI, could potentially be used to inform policy and care after hospital discharge. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health's Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and Health Innovation Program.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2014 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Sağlık
HealthSocial Sciences