PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery· 2004Q1

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Paolo Aglietti, Francesco Giron, Roberto Buzzi, Flavio Biddau et al.

Short summary

A randomized trial (n=120) found no significant differences in clinical or radiographic outcomes between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and doubled hamstring tendon grafts for ACL reconstruction at two years, though each had distinct complication profiles.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • No significant differences in visual analog score, IKDC scores, or KT-1000 laxity between BPTB and hamstring grafts at 2 years.
  • Hamstring graft group had higher prevalence of femoral tunnel widening (p < 0.01).
  • BPTB graft group had higher prevalence of postoperative kneeling discomfort (p < 0.01) and decreased skin sensitivity (p < 0.001).
  • Both grafts are considered equivalent options for ACL reconstruction when using proven surgical and rehabilitation techniques.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a matter of debate, with patellar and hamstring tendons being the two most popular autologous graft options. The objective of this study was to determine in a prospective, randomized clinical trial whether two grafts (bone-patellar tendon-bone or doubled hamstring tendons) fixed with modern devices affect the two-year minimum clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with a chronic unilateral rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament underwent arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with use of either autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone or doubled hamstring tendon grafts, in a strictly alternating manner. Both groups were comparable with regard to demographic data, preoperative activity level, mechanism of injury, interval between the injury and the operation, and the amount of knee laxity present preoperatively. The same well-proven surgical technique and aggressive controlled rehabilitation was used. An independent observer, who was blinded with regard to the involved leg and the type of graft, performed the outcome assessment with use of a visual analog scale, the new International Knee Documentation Committee form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Functional Knee Score for Anterior Knee Pain, and an arthrometric and an isokinetic dynamometric evaluation. Radiographs were also made. RESULTS: At the two-year follow-up evaluation, no differences were found in terms of the visual analog score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the new International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective evaluation scores, the KT-1000 side-to-side laxity measurements, the Functional Knee Score for Anterior Knee Pain, muscle strength recovery, or return to sports activities. In the bone-patellar tendon-bone group, we found a higher prevalence of postoperative kneeling discomfort (p < 0.01) and an increased area of decreased skin sensitivity (p < 0.001). In the hamstring tendon group, we recorded a higher prevalence of femoral tunnel widening (p < 0.01). In this group, a correlation was also found between medial meniscectomy and an increased prevalence of pivot-shift glide (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that, with use of accurate and proven surgical and rehabilitation techniques, both grafts are an equivalent option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2004 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Surgery

SurgeryMedicine