PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Energies· 2026Q1

Energy Policy and Energy Management in China: Governance Logic and Future Pathways of Structural Transformation

haixin Huang, Haowei Qie, Runyi Du, Feng Liu

Short summary

China's energy policy is moving from expanding capacity to systemic restructuring, driven by new targets for non-fossil energy (25% of primary consumption, 50% of electricity by 2030) and a shift from dual control of energy consumption to carbon emissions. This transition is fundamentally a change in governance logic, not just technology.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • China aims for non-fossil energy to reach 25% of primary consumption and 50% of electricity generation by 2030.
  • Management is shifting from dual control over energy consumption to dual control over carbon emissions.
  • Key challenges include balancing energy security, low-carbon goals, and economic objectives, alongside new energy integration and digital transformation.
  • The energy transition is characterized as a fundamental shift in governance logic, emphasizing institutional governance over administrative dominance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

China’s energy policy and management are transitioning from scale expansion to systemic restructuring. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021–2025), renewables accounted for approximately 60% of installed capacity, and the Energy Law took effect. Entering the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026–2030), binding targets require non-fossil energy to reach 25% of primary consumption and 50% of electricity generation. Meanwhile, the management system is shifting from dual control over energy consumption to dual control over carbon emissions. This paper examines China’s energy governance transition across three dimensions: policy evolution, management challenges, and institutional restructuring. In terms of policy, the 14th Five-Year Plan saw accelerated green transition, while the 15th centers on carbon peaking, shifting from scale to structure-orientation, and from policy-driven to rule-of-law-based governance. In terms of management, four challenges emerge, including tensions among security, low-carbon, and economic objectives, bottlenecks in new energy integration, social costs of transitioning traditional energy roles, and governance hurdles in digital transformation, revealing structural barriers to policy implementation. In terms of institutional restructuring, rule of law, marketization, and systematization are advancing in parallel, shaping the institutional framework for governance modernization. Looking ahead, computing-energy coupling, zero-carbon industrial park experiments, and international governance dimensions are emerging as frontier issues. This paper argues that China’s energy transition is not merely technological or industrial, but a fundamental shift in governance logic. The modernization of governance capacity, rather than unidimensional gains in installed capacity or technical metrics, determines the transition’s success. The deep shift from scale expansion to systemic restructuring, and from administrative dominance to institutional governance, will shape the future of China’s energy development.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Energies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Energy

General EnergyEnergy