PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Discourse Processes· 2026Q1

Evidential practices in interaction: transforming perception into corroborative evidence

Leon Shor, Anna Inbar

Short summary

The Hebrew particle 'hine' can frame both physical objects and interactional events as corroborative evidence for claims by marking a shift in the speaker's perceptual access.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Hebrew particle 'hine' is analyzed for its role in framing entities as corroborative evidence.
  • Findings show 'hine' can evidence physical objects in the immediate environment.
  • 'Hine' also evidences interactional phenomena, including physical actions and stretches of talk.
  • The particle marks a shift in the speaker's perceptual access, presenting this accessed entity as evidence for a claim.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study explores the evidential use of the Hebrew particle hine in spoken interaction. Traditionally described as a presentative particle that directs attention to entities in the immediate speech situation, hine has recently been reanalyzed as more fundamentally marking a change in the speaker’s perceptual access to a relevant entity. Building on that proposal, the current study investigates how this perceptual shift can be mobilized to frame entities as corroborative evidence for speakers’ claims in interaction. The analysis is based on video-recorded data from naturally occurring spoken Hebrew interactions. The findings show that hine can frame as evidence both physical objects in the immediate environment and interactional phenomena that emerge within the unfolding encounter. In cases involving material objects, hine registers the noticing of a perceptually accessible entity and presents it as supporting a previously expressed claim. In other cases, the particle targets interactional events such as physical actions or stretches of talk, treating them as perceptually apprehended objects that can serve as evidence. More broadly, the analysis demonstrates how evidential practices in conversation may arise from linguistic forms whose primary function concerns the organization of perceptual access.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discourse Processes, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Language and Linguistics

Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities