Microbiology Spectrum· 2026Q1
Artificial genetic augmentation of T6SS activity affects effector repertoire and host toxicity
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Artificial augmentation of T6SS activity in *Vibrio proteolyticus* revealed that effectors Tie1 and Tie2 exhibit host-dependent toxicity, with Tie1 only affecting murine cells and Tie2 impacting both murine and oyster cells. Furthermore, different regulators induce distinct effector repertoires, with Ats3 activating all three known effectors (Tie1, Tie2, Tie3) while deleting the negative regulator hns1 did not induce Tie3.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The T6SS effector Tie1 is toxic to murine cells but not oyster hemocytes.
- The T6SS effector Tie2 is toxic to both murine cells and oyster hemocytes.
- Overexpression of the activator Ats3 induces all three known T6SS effectors (Tie1, Tie2, Tie3).
- Deleting the negative regulator hns1 did not induce the orphan effector Tie3.
- T6SS effector contribution to intoxication can be host-dependent.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Type VI secretion system (T6SS), a toxic effector-delivery apparatus primarily studied for its antibacterial properties, has recently emerged as a widespread anti-eukaryotic determinant, particularly in members of the genus Vibrio . Although various anti-eukaryotic effectors have been described, it remains unknown whether effectors target distinct hosts in a similar manner. Moreover, it is unclear whether the entire effector arsenal encoded in a single genome is co-regulated across different conditions and by the same regulators. Here, we employ the anti-eukaryotic T6SS3 of Vibrio proteolyticus to address these knowledge gaps. By monitoring toxicity during infection of oyster hemocytes and comparing the results with previous infections of murine macrophages, we find that the effector Tie1 plays a role only in intoxicating murine cells, whereas Tie2 intoxicates both cell models. Furthermore, we show that artificial augmentation of T6SS3 activity by deleting the negative regulator hns1 fails to induce the orphan effector Tie3, whereas overexpression of the T6SS3-specific activator, Ats3, induces all three known effectors. Using Ats3 overexpression to activate all three effectors, we show that both Tie2 and Tie3 participate in hemocyte intoxication. Collectively, these findings indicate that analyses of T6SS-mediated infections must factor in the possibility of partial activation of the effector repertoire even when the main gene cluster is fully induced, and that the contribution of anti-eukaryotic T6SS effectors to intoxication may be host-dependent. IMPORTANCE The type VI secretion system (T6SS), a bacterial toxin-delivery apparatus, has recently been shown to mediate virulence in various marine Vibrio species. Each T6SS delivers a cocktail of toxins into a host cell, yet it is unknown whether toxins intoxicate different hosts in the same manner. Moreover, many investigations of T6SSs artificially activate the system by manipulating a transcription factor, yet it remains unknown whether different regulators induce the same toxin repertoire. Here, we show that a T6SS toxin that intoxicates one organism can be inert during the infection of another host. Furthermore, we demonstrate that T6SS-inducing regulators can activate distinct toxin repertoires. These findings suggest that conclusions about the role of T6SS toxins during infection should be drawn with caution, given the specific host model used, especially when the T6SS is artificially activated.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Microbiology Spectrum, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
EndocrinologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology