Electronics· 2026Q2
A Taylor-Augmented Simpson Method for Highly Oscillatory ODEs: Consistency Order, Interval of Periodicity and Computational Cost
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new Taylor-augmented Simpson 1/3 corrector method achieves second-order consistency for highly oscillatory ODEs, offering comparable accuracy to RK4 at one-seventh the execution time for fine step sizes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Taylor-augmented Simpson 1/3 corrector is consistent of order two for highly oscillatory ODEs.
- The method's interval of periodicity extends to a digital frequency Ω≈1.7968 and a maximum functional step h≈0.286T.
- At fine step sizes, the method achieves accuracy comparable to RK4 but with significantly reduced execution time (approximately 1/7th).
- The method struggles with coarse discretization, exhibiting phase-alternation issues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The numerical integration of ordinary differential equations exhibiting highly oscillatory dynamics requires a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy that classical fixed-step solvers struggle to achieve. We examine a Taylor-augmented variant of the Simpson 1/3 corrector, in which an explicit second-derivative term evaluated on a three-node central stencil is appended to the classical two-step formula. A formal local truncation error analysis shows the augmented scheme to be consistent of order two, compared with the fourth-order accuracy of the unaugmented Milne–Simpson corrector; no claim of higher-order convergence is made, and the measured convergence rate confirms this value. A linear multistep analysis yields the interval of periodicity in closed form, extending to a digital frequency Ω≈1.7968 and a maximum functional step h≈0.286T, marginally wider than the classical 3 bound. Using a linearized harmonic oscillator at 1 kHz, 100 kHz and 1 MHz, the scheme is benchmarked against Runge–Kutta (RK4), Dormand–Prince, Rosenbrock and Milne–Simpson baselines in terms of maximum relative error and execution time. Under coarse discretization it loses tracking, exhibiting the phase-alternation signature of the parasitic root of this method family. At fine step sizes, it attains accuracy comparable to RK4 at roughly one-seventh of the execution time, positioning it as a low-cost fixed-step option where per-step expense dominates and asymptotic order is not the binding constraint.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Electronics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Numerical Analysis
Numerical AnalysisMathematics