PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Netherlands Heart Journal· 2026Q2

Palliative care in chronic heart failure in the Netherlands: practices, competencies and barriers among hospital-based healthcare professionals

M.S.A. Aertsen Van Der Kuip, Yvonne M.J. Goërtz, D.H. Frank Gommans, Sebastiaan C.A.M. Bekkers et al.

Short summary

While 97% of Dutch hospital-based healthcare professionals (HCPs) deem palliative care (PC) and advance care planning (ACP) vital for chronic heart failure (HF) patients, only about one-third provide it regularly, and just 23% feel sufficiently skilled.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 97% of surveyed Dutch HCPs consider PC and ACP for chronic HF patients very important.
  • Only about one-third of HCPs regularly provide PC and ACP to chronic HF patients.
  • While 78% can recognize PC needs, only 23% feel sufficiently skilled in providing PC.
  • Lack of skills and time constraints are primary barriers to integrating PC and ACP into routine chronic HF care.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although proven beneficial, palliative care (PC) and advance care planning (ACP) for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) are still underexposed. This study aimed to (1) explore current practices of hospital-based healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding PC and ACP in chronic HF, (2) assess their competencies, and (3) identify barriers to integrate PC and ACP into routine chronic HF care in the Netherlands. METHODS: A task force of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology developed an online survey using Qualtrics. The survey was distributed among HCPs involved in the care of patients with chronic HF by the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Dutch Society of Cardiovascular Nurses to contacts, and through social media channels between February and March 2022. RESULTS: 120 HCPs (cardiologists (49%), nurses and nurse practitioners (40%), and allied professionals (11%)) completed the survey. 97% of HCPs found PC and ACP for patients with chronic HF (very) important, yet only about one third providing such care regularly. While 78% reported being able to recognize PC needs, only 23% felt sufficiently skilled providing PC. Reported priorities for improvement included ACP, recognition of PC needs, interprofessional collaboration, communication with patients and significant others, and sufficient time to provide PC and ACP. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs acknowledge the importance of PC and ACP in chronic HF, but integration into routine practice remains limited. Barriers are lack of skills and time constraints. There is a need for education and appropriate organization of PC and ACP for patients with chronic HF in the Netherlands.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Netherlands Heart Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine