Journal of Personalized Medicine· 2026Q1
A Physical Therapy Clinical Framework for Temporomandibular Disorders: Integrating DC/TMD, ICOP and Multidimensional Patient Phenotyping
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new clinical framework integrates diagnostic standards (DC/TMD, ICOP) with multidimensional patient phenotyping to guide personalized physiotherapy for Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The framework integrates diagnostic standards (DC/TMD, ICOP) with multidimensional patient phenotyping for TMDs.
- Assessment focuses on clinically relevant and modifiable features: pain mechanisms, mandibular mobility/control, behavioral load, comorbidities, and psychosocial factors.
- This multidimensional data informs personalized treatment targets, intervention intensity, outcome selection, and interdisciplinary care needs.
- Interventions (education, exercise, manual therapy, behavioral strategies) are selected based on explicit clinical objectives, not just diagnostic labels.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinically heterogeneous, and patients sharing the same diagnosis may differ substantially in pain mechanisms, functional impairments, behavioral contributors, comorbidities, psychosocial burden, prognosis, and treatment response. Although the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP), and the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) provide essential diagnostic standards, they do not directly translate diagnosis into individualized physiotherapy management. This Masterclass proposes an evidence-informed clinical framework designed to bridge this gap and support personalized, evidence-based practice. Developed through targeted literature searches, citation tracking, and narrative synthesis of diagnostic standards, clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, consensus documents, and key phenotyping studies, the framework retains established diagnoses as clinical anchors while adding a physiotherapy-oriented translational layer. Assessment focuses on clinically relevant and potentially modifiable features, including familiar pain, mandibular mobility and motor control, behavioral load, regional and sleep-related comorbidities, psychosocial factors, prognosis, and pain-mechanism hypotheses. These findings are integrated with patient goals and preferences to identify dominant treatment targets, inform intervention intensity, select appropriate outcomes, and determine when interdisciplinary care is required. Education, therapeutic exercise, selected manual therapy, and behavioral strategies are therefore considered according to explicit clinical objectives rather than diagnostic labels alone. The framework distinguishes evidence-supported components from extrapolated and hypothesis-generating propositions and aims to make physiotherapy management more transparent, reproducible, patient-centered, and testable.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy
Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions