PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society· 2026Q1

Problems of code: ethnographic encounters with the Amazon Forest as a computational model

Felipe Mammoli, Marko Synésio Alves Monteiro

Short summary

Ethnographic study of AmazonFACE climate model reveals code functions as both text and process, enabling and complicating scientific collaboration and knowledge production.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Computer code is increasingly central to earth system scientists' knowledge practices and social relations.
  • Code's dual nature as text and process makes it a valuable ethnographic site for studying scientific collaboration.
  • Access to source code is a shared challenge for ethnographers and modelers, resulting in partial understanding.
  • Computational practices, including code assembly, sustain scientific collaborations and shape careers and knowledge.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As environmental issues become increasingly datafied, computer code is becoming more important to the quotidian work of earth system scientists. Not only has code become central to their knowledge practices, it has become a way in which social relations travel through global knowledge infrastructures, connecting knowledge, data, and people. This article explores the use of code as material for ethnographic inquiry through the study of how a predictive model about climate change in the Amazon is built at the AmazonFACE modeling laboratory. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, we show that computer code has an ambiguous nature: as both text and process. This duality involving matters of knowledge (how code connects data) and matters of interpersonal relationships (how code connects people) enables it to function as an ethnographic fieldsite. We show that access to source code is a symmetrical problem for ethnographers and modelers alike, producing partial forms of understanding. Based on reading code fragments, we examine how reading, writing, and maintaining code sustain scientific collaborations while simultaneously separating “scientific” contributions from “technical” labor. By following how new and old code are assembled in the model’s source code, we show how careers, knowledge, and relations are made and maintained through computational practices.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science

History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities