Policy Politics & Nursing Practice· 2026Q1
Evaluating Nursing Career Development Programs: A Scoping Review
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A scoping review of 8 studies reveals a significant global gap in evaluating nursing career development programs, despite evidence suggesting they positively impact professional development and nurse retention.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Only 8 studies met inclusion criteria, indicating a significant research gap in evaluating nursing career development programs.
- Programs show positive impacts on professional development and nurse retention.
- Key themes include diverse program structures, varied outcome measures, and implementation challenges.
- Measuring program effectiveness, patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness remains a challenge.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based nursing career development programs can support workforce planning, retention, and recruitment by harmonizing career guidance, capability development, and progression. Despite their recognized value, utilization varies across countries, organizations, and specialties, with limited evaluation of their development, implementation, or effectiveness. This scoping review explores key themes to inform nursing career development for Aotearoa New Zealand and identifies areas for further research. AIM: To provide a comprehensive overview of what is known about the evaluation of nursing career development programs. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted using Levac's six-step model. Rayyan software supported extraction and synthesis. CINAHL, ProQuest Central, PubMed, Scopus, and Policy Commons were searched for peer-reviewed and gray literature published between 2005 and 2025. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, reflecting the scarcity of research in this area. Three key themes emerged: (a) differing program structures, (b) varied outcome measures and implementation approaches, and (c) individual and organizational barriers and facilitators. Evidence suggests career development programs positively impact professional development and nurse retention, but challenges include administrative burden and difficulties in measuring effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights a significant gap in evaluating nursing career development programs globally. Evidence supports these programs as valuable tools for workforce development, while knowledge gaps remain regarding patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QK5MG).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Policy Politics & Nursing Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Research and TheoryNursing