Annals of Internal Medicine· 2026Q1
Büyük Dil Modelleri Senaryolarda %5,4 Oranında Yanlış Kullanım Öneriyor, İki Alanda Yoğunlaşıyor
Overuse and False Restraint in Large Language Model Recommendations for Choosing Wisely Scenarios
- 1atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2026yıl
Kısa özet
Ticari büyük dil modelleri (BDM'ler), Seçim Yaparken Akıllıca (Choosing Wisely) kılavuzlarına dayanan senaryoların %5,4'ünde aşırı kullanım önerdi; bu hataların büyük çoğunluğu (%42,8 yanıt) tiroid ultrasonları ve düşük riskli yetişkinlerde rutin EKG'ler (%28,3 yanıt) için gerçekleşti.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- BDM'ler, Seçim Yaparken Akıllıca (Choosing Wisely) kılavuzlarına dayanan senaryoların %5,4'ünde aşırı kullanım önerdi.
- Aşırı kullanım, insidental nodüller için tiroid ultrasonu (%42,8 yanıt) ve düşük riskli yetişkinlerde rutin EKG'ler (%28,3 yanıt) önerilerinde yoğunlaştı.
- Yanlış kısıtlama nadirdi (%0,6 yanıt) ve PSA taramasında en yüksekti (%3,3).
- BDM'ler değerlendirilen 15 öneriden 8'i için aşırı kullanım önermedi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely initiative made recommendations where screening, testing, or treatment may be overused, with caveats around appropriate use. Clinicians are increasingly using large language models (LLMs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether commercial LLMs appropriately call for restraint or action from scenarios based on Choosing Wisely recommendations. DESIGN: Benchmark evaluation. Fifteen Choosing Wisely recommendations were used to develop 225 scenarios (per recommendation, 10 in which restraint was appropriate and 5 in which action was appropriate). Six commercial LLMs (3 runs each) generated 4050 responses to the 225 scenarios, using a prompt from the clinician perspective. SETTING: Production application programming interfaces of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google from February to March 2026. PARTICIPANTS: No human participants were involved. MEASUREMENTS: Co-primary outcomes were the overuse rate (endorsing action when restraint was appropriate) and the false restraint rate (withholding an appropriate action). RESULTS: The rate of LLM-recommended overuse was 5.4% (95% CI, 0.6% to 12.2%); LLMs did not recommend overuse in 8 of 15 recommendations. Two recommendations accounted for most LLM-recommended overuse: thyroid ultrasound for an incidental subcentimeter nodule (overuse recommended in 42.8% of LLM responses) and routine electrocardiography in low-risk adults (overuse recommended in 28.3% of LLM responses). The LLMs recommended overuse in 0.6% to 3.3% of responses for the remaining 5 recommendations. False restraint was rare (0.6% [CI, 0.1% to 1.2%]), was absent for 11 of 15 recommendations, and was highest for prostate-specific antigen screening (3.3%). LIMITATIONS: Single prompts without follow-up; a benchmark rather than real-world use; responses classified by LLM judge with physician adjudication. Findings may not extend to consumer-facing use. CONCLUSION: The LLMs rarely withheld recommendations for treatment when it was appropriate. Overuse was concentrated in 2 recommendations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Genel Sağlık Meslekleri
General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions