PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

Annals of Internal Medicine· 2026Q1

Büyük Dil Modelleri Senaryolarda %5,4 Oranında Yanlış Kullanım Öneriyor, İki Alanda Yoğunlaşıyor

Overuse and False Restraint in Large Language Model Recommendations for Choosing Wisely Scenarios

Dean Ariel, Stav Endelman, Guy Laban

Kısa özet

Ticari büyük dil modelleri (BDM'ler), Seçim Yaparken Akıllıca (Choosing Wisely) kılavuzlarına dayanan senaryoların %5,4'ünde aşırı kullanım önerdi; bu hataların büyük çoğunluğu (%42,8 yanıt) tiroid ultrasonları ve düşük riskli yetişkinlerde rutin EKG'ler (%28,3 yanıt) için gerçekleşti.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • BDM'ler, Seçim Yaparken Akıllıca (Choosing Wisely) kılavuzlarına dayanan senaryoların %5,4'ünde aşırı kullanım önerdi.
  • Aşırı kullanım, insidental nodüller için tiroid ultrasonu (%42,8 yanıt) ve düşük riskli yetişkinlerde rutin EKG'ler (%28,3 yanıt) önerilerinde yoğunlaştı.
  • Yanlış kısıtlama nadirdi (%0,6 yanıt) ve PSA taramasında en yüksekti (%3,3).
  • BDM'ler değerlendirilen 15 öneriden 8'i için aşırı kullanım önermedi.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely initiative made recommendations where screening, testing, or treatment may be overused, with caveats around appropriate use. Clinicians are increasingly using large language models (LLMs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether commercial LLMs appropriately call for restraint or action from scenarios based on Choosing Wisely recommendations. DESIGN: Benchmark evaluation. Fifteen Choosing Wisely recommendations were used to develop 225 scenarios (per recommendation, 10 in which restraint was appropriate and 5 in which action was appropriate). Six commercial LLMs (3 runs each) generated 4050 responses to the 225 scenarios, using a prompt from the clinician perspective. SETTING: Production application programming interfaces of OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google from February to March 2026. PARTICIPANTS: No human participants were involved. MEASUREMENTS: Co-primary outcomes were the overuse rate (endorsing action when restraint was appropriate) and the false restraint rate (withholding an appropriate action). RESULTS: The rate of LLM-recommended overuse was 5.4% (95% CI, 0.6% to 12.2%); LLMs did not recommend overuse in 8 of 15 recommendations. Two recommendations accounted for most LLM-recommended overuse: thyroid ultrasound for an incidental subcentimeter nodule (overuse recommended in 42.8% of LLM responses) and routine electrocardiography in low-risk adults (overuse recommended in 28.3% of LLM responses). The LLMs recommended overuse in 0.6% to 3.3% of responses for the remaining 5 recommendations. False restraint was rare (0.6% [CI, 0.1% to 1.2%]), was absent for 11 of 15 recommendations, and was highest for prostate-specific antigen screening (3.3%). LIMITATIONS: Single prompts without follow-up; a benchmark rather than real-world use; responses classified by LLM judge with physician adjudication. Findings may not extend to consumer-facing use. CONCLUSION: The LLMs rarely withheld recommendations for treatment when it was appropriate. Overuse was concentrated in 2 recommendations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarPremium
Makaleye SorÜcretsiz hesapla

Ücretsiz hesapla devam et

Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.

Web'de ücretsiz devam et

Google ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.

Telefonda:

Alan: Genel Sağlık Meslekleri

General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions