Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy· 2012Q1
Daha Kısa 4 Metrelik Yürüme Testi, Yaşlı Yetişkinlerde 10 Metrelik Teste Göre Daha Az Geçerli
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of a Shorter Walk Test Compared With the 10-Meter Walk Test for Measurements of Gait Speed in Healthy, Older Adults
- 648atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2012yıl
Kısa özet
4 Metrelik Yürüme Testi mükemmel test-tekrar test güvenirliği (ICC 0.96-0.98) gösterse de, sağlıklı yaşlı yetişkinlerde yürüme hızı için 10 Metrelik Yürüme Testi ile birbirinin yerine kullanılamaz; Bland-Altman analizi ±0.15 ila ±0.17 m/s'lik bir tutarsızlık ortaya koymuştur.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Hem 4 hem de 10 Metrelik Yürüme Testleri, sağlıklı yaşlı yetişkinlerde mükemmel test-tekrar test güvenirliği (ICC 0.96-0.98) göstermektedir.
- Kronometre ve otomatik zamanlayıcılar, yüksek güvenilirliğe sahip yürüme hızı ölçümleri sağlamaktadır (ICC 0.99-1.00).
- 4 ve 10 Metrelik Yürüme Testleri arasındaki yürüme hızı ölçümleri arasında ±0.15 ila ±0.17 m/s'lik bir tutarsızlık bulunmaktadır.
- 4 Metrelik Yürüme Testi, 10 Metrelik Yürüme Testi ile birbirinin yerine kullanılabilecek kadar geçerli değildir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Walking speed is associated with several health-related outcomes. Research examining how differences in test walking distance affect walking speed reliability and validity is limited. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and concurrent validity of gait speed measurements obtained from a 4-Meter Walk Test compared with the commonly used 10-Meter Walk Test. A second objective was to similarly examine 2 different timing methods: stopwatch and automatic timers. METHODS: Forty-three healthy, older adults (mean age = 84.3 ± 6.9 years) performed 3 consecutive walking trials on the 4- and 10-Meter Walk Tests at their self-selected walking speed. RESULTS: Gait speed measurements for both tests were shown to have excellent test-retest reliability (ICC values of 0.96-0.98), with similar results for stopwatch and automatic timer assessments (ICC values of 0.99-1.00). Standard error of the measurement (SEM) values were small (0.004-0.008 m/s) across measurement methods. While the ICC value for gait speed measurements between the 2 walk tests was 0.93, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed a discrepancy of ±0.15 to ±0.17 m/s between measurement methods. DISCUSSION: Both 4- and 10-m gait speed assessments had excellent test-retest reliability with similar SEM and minimal detectable change values. There was little difference in SEM values between the 2 timing methods. While the mean difference in gait speed between the 4- and 10-Meter Walk Tests was small, the range of the measurement differences was large enough to potentially mask meaningful changes in gait speed over time if both methods were used interchangeably. CONCLUSIONS: While the reliability of both walking tests is excellent, the 4-Meter Walk Test does not exhibit a high enough degree of concurrent validity with the 10-Meter Walk Test to be used interchangeably for gait speed assessments in healthy, older adults. We therefore recommend using the 10-Meter Walk Test to obtain the most valid clinical assessment of walking speed when using it as a 1-time indicator of health status.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 2012 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Fizyoterapi, Spor Terapisi ve Rehabilitasyon
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions