New England Journal of Medicine· 2026Q1
Orta Darlıkta Risk Faktörleri Olan Aort Darlığı Hastalarında TAVR'nin Karşılaştırılması
TAVR in Patients with Moderate Aortic Stenosis with At-Risk Features
- 1atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2026yıl
Kısa özet
Orta derecede aort darlığı ve risk faktörleri olan hastalarda, transkateter aort kapak replasmanı (TAVR), 2 yıl sonunda klinik takibe kıyasla ölüm veya kalp yetmezliği olayları insidansını %7.2 oranında azalttı (%16.7'ye karşılık %23.9).
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- TAVR, klinik takibe kıyasla 2 yıl sonunda primer sonlanım noktasını (ölüm veya kalp yetmezliği olayı) %7.2 oranında azalttı.
- Primer sonlanım noktası insidansı TAVR grubunda %16.7, klinik takip grubunda ise %23.9 olarak gerçekleşti.
- Gruplar arasında işlemle ilişkili olumsuz olaylarda anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi.
- Çalışmaya orta derecede aort darlığı ve en az bir risk faktörü olan hastalar dahil edildi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: For patients with moderate aortic stenosis, current guidelines recommend clinical surveillance with echocardiographic assessment every 1 or 2 years. Whether transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) will improve outcomes in these patients remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted an international, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate whether TAVR will result in better outcomes than clinical surveillance among patients with moderate aortic stenosis with at least one at-risk feature (i.e., a symptom or structural or functional abnormality that has been shown to be associated with faster disease progression or adverse cardiovascular outcomes). The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo transfemoral TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve or clinical surveillance. The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death from any cause or a heart-failure event with or without hospitalization at 2 years. Superiority testing was performed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: , and the mean aortic-valve peak velocity was 3.3 m per second. At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with a primary effectiveness end-point event was 16.7% in the TAVR group and 23.9% in the clinical-surveillance group (risk difference, -7.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -13.1 to -1.3; P = 0.02 for superiority). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who died from any cause was 8.4% in the TAVR group and 7.3% in the clinical-surveillance group; the estimates for a heart-failure event were 10.8% and 19.0%, respectively. The incidence of procedure-related adverse events did not differ meaningfully between the patients in the TAVR group and those in the clinical-surveillance group who underwent aortic-valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderate aortic stenosis and at-risk features, a strategy of TAVR was superior to clinical surveillance in lowering the incidence of death or a heart-failure event at 2 years. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PROGRESS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04889872.).
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Kardiyoloji ve Kardiyovasküler Tıp
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineMedicine