New England Journal of Medicine· 2018Q1
Şiddetli Akut Solunum Sıkıntısı Sendromu İçin Ekstrakorporeal Membran Oksijenasyonu
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- 2.402atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2018yıl
Kısa özet
Çok şiddetli ARDS hastalarında, venovenöz ECMO, kurtarma tedavisi olarak ECMO içeren konvansiyonel tedaviye kıyasla 60 günlük mortaliteyi anlamlı şekilde düşürmedi (%35'e karşı %46, P=0.09).
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- ECMO grubunda 60 günlük mortalite %35 iken, kontrol grubunda %46 idi (göreli risk 0.76, P=0.09).
- Kontrol hastalarının %35'i ECMO'ya geçti ve bu hastaların %57'si öldü.
- ECMO grubunda daha fazla kanama (%46'ya karşı %28) ve trombositopeni (%27'ye karşı %16) görüldü.
- ECMO grubunda daha az iskemik inme (%0'a karşı %5) görüldü.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. METHODS: of less than 80 mm Hg for more than 6 hours; or an arterial blood pH of less than 7.25 with a partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of at least 60 mm Hg for more than 6 hours - to receive immediate venovenous ECMO (ECMO group) or continued conventional treatment (control group). Crossover to ECMO was possible for patients in the control group who had refractory hypoxemia. The primary end point was mortality at 60 days. RESULTS: At 60 days, 44 of 124 patients (35%) in the ECMO group and 57 of 125 (46%) in the control group had died (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.04; P=0.09). Crossover to ECMO occurred a mean (±SD) of 6.5±9.7 days after randomization in 35 patients (28%) in the control group, with 20 of these patients (57%) dying. The frequency of complications did not differ significantly between groups, except that there were more bleeding events leading to transfusion in the ECMO group than in the control group (in 46% vs. 28% of patients; absolute risk difference, 18 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 30) as well as more cases of severe thrombocytopenia (in 27% vs. 16%; absolute risk difference, 11 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 21) and fewer cases of ischemic stroke (in no patients vs. 5%; absolute risk difference, -5 percentage points; 95% CI, -10 to -2). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with very severe ARDS, 60-day mortality was not significantly lower with ECMO than with a strategy of conventional mechanical ventilation that included ECMO as rescue therapy. (Funded by the Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement and the French Ministry of Health; EOLIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01470703 .).
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Biyomedikal Mühendislik
Biomedical EngineeringEngineering