PLoS ONE· 2018Q1· Derleme
Acil Servis Yoğunluğu: Nedenleri, Sonuçları ve Çözümlerine İlişkin Sistematik Bir Derleme
Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions
- 1.338atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2018yıl
Kısa özet
Bu sistematik derleme, acil servis (AS) yoğunluğunun belirlenen nedenleri ile uygulanan çözümler arasında önemli bir uyumsuzluk olduğunu ortaya koymuştur; çözümlerin çoğu, birincil bakıma erişim ve zamanında taburculuk gibi dışsal etkenleri ele almak yerine, dahili hasta akışına odaklanmaktadır.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Derlemeye 102 çalışma dahil edildi, bunların %51'i çözüm denemeleri veya modellemeleri yaptı.
- AS yoğunluğunun olumsuz sonuçları arasında daha kötü hasta sonuçları ve personelin yönergelere uyamaması yer alıyor.
- Belirlenen temel nedenler hasta katılımı (sayı/tip) ve taburculuk gecikmeleridir.
- Çözümlerin çoğu, harici etkenler yerine dahili AS hasta akışına odaklanıyor.
- Sistem çapındaki girişimler ve uzatılmış birincil bakım saatleri umut verici sonuçlar gösterdi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Emergency department crowding is a major global healthcare issue. There is much debate as to the causes of the phenomenon, leading to difficulties in developing successful, targeted solutions. AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyse and summarise the findings of peer-reviewed research studies investigating the causes and consequences of, and solutions to, emergency department crowding. METHOD: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A structured search of four databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science) was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed research publications aimed at investigating the causes or consequences of, or solutions to, emergency department crowding, published between January 2000 and June 2018. Two reviewers used validated critical appraisal tools to independently assess the quality of the studies. The study protocol was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017073439). RESULTS: From 4,131 identified studies and 162 full text reviews, 102 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were retrospective cohort studies, with the greatest proportion (51%) trialling or modelling potential solutions to emergency department crowding. Fourteen studies examined causes and 40 investigated consequences. Two studies looked at both causes and consequences, and two investigated causes and solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The negative consequences of ED crowding are well established, including poorer patient outcomes and the inability of staff to adhere to guideline-recommended treatment. This review identified a mismatch between causes and solutions. The majority of identified causes related to the number and type of people attending ED and timely discharge from ED, while reported solutions focused on efficient patient flow within the ED. Solutions aimed at the introduction of whole-of-system initiatives to meet timed patient disposition targets, as well as extended hours of primary care, demonstrated promising outcomes. While the review identified increased presentations by the elderly with complex and chronic conditions as an emerging and widespread driver of crowding, more research is required to isolate the precise local factors leading to ED crowding, with system-wide solutions tailored to address identified causes.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. PLoS ONE, 2018 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Acil Tıp
Emergency MedicineMedicine