Medical Decision Making· 2014Q2
Tıbbi Karar Vermede Bilişsel Yanlılıklar ve Sezgisel Yöntemler
Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making
- 551atıf
- Q2SCImago
- 2014yıl
Kısa özet
Tıbbi karar verme üzerine yapılan çalışmaların çoğu (%77), gerçekçi olmayan varsayımsal senaryolara dayanıyor, bu da bulgularının gerçek hasta ve hekim seçimlerine uygulanabilirliği konusunda endişelere yol açıyor.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- İncelenen 213 çalışmanın %77'si gerçek tıbbi kararlar yerine varsayımsal senaryolar kullandı.
- Çalışmaların %68'i bilişsel yanlılık veya sezgisel yöntem varlığını doğruladı.
- Çalışmaların yalnızca %34'ü tıp personelini inceledi; geri kalanı hastalara odaklandı.
- Örneklem büyüklüğü ve doğrulanmış araçların eksikliği gibi metodolojik zayıflıklar yaygındı.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: The role of cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making is of growing interest. The purpose of this study was to determine whether studies on cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making are based on actual or hypothetical decisions and are conducted with populations that are representative of those who typically make the medical decision; to categorize the types of cognitive biases and heuristics found and whether they are found in patients or in medical personnel; and to critically review the studies based on standard methodological quality criteria. METHOD: Data sources were original, peer-reviewed, empirical studies on cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making found in Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, and the CINAHL databases published in 1980-2013. Predefined exclusion criteria were used to identify 213 studies. During data extraction, information was collected on type of bias or heuristic studied, respondent population, decision type, study type (actual or hypothetical), study method, and study conclusion. RESULTS: Of the 213 studies analyzed, 164 (77%) were based on hypothetical vignettes, and 175 (82%) were conducted with representative populations. Nineteen types of cognitive biases and heuristics were found. Only 34% of studies (n = 73) investigated medical personnel, and 68% (n = 145) confirmed the presence of a bias or heuristic. Each methodological quality criterion was satisfied by more than 50% of the studies, except for sample size and validated instruments/questions. Limitations are that existing terms were used to inform search terms, and study inclusion criteria focused strictly on decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the studies on biases and heuristics in medical decision making are based on hypothetical vignettes, raising concerns about applicability of these findings to actual decision making. Biases and heuristics have been underinvestigated in medical personnel compared with patients.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Medical Decision Making, 2014 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Aile Hekimliği
Family PracticeMedicine