PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety· 2026Q1

Hekimlerin REMS Programleri ile Ilgili Risk Iletisimi Anlayislari ve Algilari

Physician Understanding and Perceptions of Risk Communication Related to Drugs Covered by Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs

Heidi Zakoul, Carol Cosenza, Su Been Lee, Winta Tekle ve diğerleri

Kısa özet

Hekimlerin çoğu REMS ile ilgili ilaç riskleri konusunda bilgili ancak REMS tarafından kapsanmayan yan etkiler hakkında daha fazla bilgi, EMR ile daha iyi entegrasyon ve REMS materyallerinin zamanında güncellenmesini istemektedir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • Hekimler REMS ile ilgili ilaç riskleri konusunda bilgili ancak REMS tarafından kapsanmayan yan etkiler konusunda endişeli.
  • Hekimler, REMS'i klinik kullanım ve izleme algoritmaları hakkında bilgi edinmek için değerli buluyor.
  • Hekimler, REMS programlarının EMR'lerle entegrasyonunu istiyor.
  • Hekimler, fayda-risk özetlerini, REMS yükümlülüklerini ve klinik verilere bağlantıları içeren elektronik iletişimleri tercih ediyor.
  • Hekimler, yeni güvenlik verileri ortaya çıktıkça REMS materyallerinin zamanında güncellenmesini tavsiye ediyor.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

ABSTRACT Purpose To help ensure that a drug's benefits outweigh its risks, the US Food and Drug Administration may require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program with requirements such as laboratory tests or special education. Since physicians are often responsible for REMS testing or education, it is critical to understand how they view the implementation of REMS programs. This study aimed to assess physicians' understanding of REMS programs, perception of the programs' value, and preferences for risk communication. Methods Between April 2022 and June 2023, we conducted approximately 1 h semi‐structured interviews with 50 physicians—6 to 9 per drug—experienced with REMS programs covering the following drugs: alemtuzumab, ambrisentan, clozapine, isotretinoin, lenalidomide/pomalidomide/thalidomide, pegvaliase, and sodium oxybate. We used qualitative content analysis to code the transcript interviews. Results Most physicians were knowledgeable about REMS‐related risks but expressed concern about side effects of the drugs not covered by the REMS programs. In the REMS certification process, physicians valued learning information about the clinical use of the drugs and monitoring algorithms intended to keep patients safe. Some physicians reported informational gaps in REMS enrollment forms, and several desired integration of REMS programs with electronic medical records (EMRs). Physicians preferred to learn about REMS programs via electronic communications that include a summary of the drug's benefit–risk profile and REMS obligations, as well as accessible links to clinical trial results and scientific articles. Physicians also recommended that REMS materials be updated in a timely fashion as new safety data emerge. Conclusions While physicians largely expressed awareness of REMS testing requirements and found REMS programs to be valuable sources of risk communication, they would like more information on managing side effects, more accessible information on REMS requirements, integration of REMS programs with EMRs, and timely updates to REMS materials as new safety information emerges.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2026 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarUygulamada
Makaleye SorUygulamada

Devamı Pofolia uygulamasında

Çıkarımlar ve makaleye soru sorma; ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Ücretsiz.

Web'de giriş yaparak aç

ToxicologyPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics