Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery· 2009Q1
Labrum Yeniden Tespit Edilmesi, Kalça Sıkışması İçin Debridement'ten Daha İyi Sonuç Verdi
Arthroscopic Debridement Versus Refixation of the Acetabular Labrum Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement
- 416atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2009yıl
Kısa özet
Femoroasetabular sıkışma hastalarında, labrum yeniden tespit edilmesi, debridement'e kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha iyi kalça sonuçları (%94.3'e karşılık %88.9 modifiye Harris Kalça Skoru) ve daha yüksek oranda iyi ila mükemmel sonuçlar (%89.7'ye karşılık %66.7) ile sonuçlanmıştır.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Labrum yeniden tespit edilmesi, 1 yıllık takipte debridement'e (88.9) kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha iyi modifiye Harris Kalça Skorları (94.3) sağlamıştır.
- Labrum yeniden tespitinden sonra kalçaların %89.7'sinde iyi ila mükemmel sonuçlar elde edilirken, debridement sonrası bu oran %66.7'dir.
- Her iki prosedür de öznel sonuçları iyileştirmiş, ancak yeniden tespit, pincer veya kombine femoroasetabular sıkışması olan hastalarda daha üstün sonuçlar vermiştir.
- Çalışmaya debridement grubunda 36 kalça, yeniden tespit grubunda ise 39 kalça dahil edilmiş ve minimum 1 yıl takip yapılmıştır.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic labral debridement with those of labral refixation. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent labral debridement during a period before the development of labral repair techniques. Patients with labral tears deemed repairable with our current arthroscopic technique were compared with patients who underwent labral refixation with a minimum 1 of year of follow-up. To better match the 2 groups, only patients with labral pathology caused by pincer-type or combined pincer- and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement were included. In the first 36 hips the labrum was debrided (group 1); in the next 39 hips the labrum underwent refixation (group 2). Outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively with the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), Short Form 12, and visual analog scale for pain. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained to evaluate bony resection (alpha angle) and osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade). RESULTS: The mean age was 31 years in group 1, with a mean follow-up of 21.4 months, and 27 years in group 2, with a mean follow-up of 16.5 months. Preoperative subjective outcomes scores were not significantly different between groups. At the 1-year follow-up visit, subjective outcomes were significantly improved (P < .01) in both groups. HHSs were significantly better for the refixation group (94.3) compared with the debridement group (88.9) at 1 year (P = .029). At most recent follow-up, good to excellent results were noted in 66.7% of hips in the debridement group compared with 89.7% of hips in the refixation group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Although other variables could have influenced these outcomes, these preliminary results indicate that labral refixation resulted in better HHS outcomes and a greater percentage of good to excellent results compared with the results of labral debridement in an earlier cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2009 · DOI ↗
Devamı Pofolia uygulamasında
Çıkarımlar ve makaleye soru sorma; ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Ücretsiz.
Web'de giriş yaparak açAlan: Cerrahi
SurgeryMedicine