JAAOS Global Research and Reviews· 2018Q1
Dijital Ağrı Ölçekleri Kağıt Ölçeklerle Eşleşiyor, Bir Uyarı ile
Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults
- 1.166atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2018yıl
Kısa özet
Dizüstü bilgisayar ve mobil telefonlardaki dijital görsel analog ağrı ölçekleri (VAS), kağıt tabanlı geleneksel VAS'lara kıyasla klinik olarak anlamlı bir fark göstermemektedir, ancak mobil telefon puanlarında orantılı bir yanlılık gözlemlenmiştir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Dizüstü bilgisayar ve mobil telefonlardaki dijital VAS, 98 yetişkin hastada kağıt tabanlı VAS ile karşılaştırıldı.
- Kağıt ve dizüstü bilgisayar VAS arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı.
- Mobil telefon VAS, kağıt VAS'a kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark (%1.9 ± %0.5) ve orantılı yanlılık gösterdi.
- Gözlemlenen farklar, klinik olarak önemli minimum fark olan 1.4 cm'nin (%14) altında kaldı.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
Background: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between “no pain” and “worst pain.” Methods: One hundred consecutive patients aged ≥18 years who presented with a chief complaint of pain were asked to record pain scores via a paper VAS and digitally via both the laptop computer and mobile phone. Ninety-eight subjects, 51 men (age, 44 ± 16 years) and 47 women (age, 46 ± 15 years), were included. A mixed-model analysis of covariance with the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to detect differences between the paper and digital VAS scores. A Bland–Altman analysis was used to test for instrument agreement between the platforms. The minimal clinically important difference was set at 1.4 cm (14% of total scale length) for detecting clinical relevance between the three VAS platforms. A paired one-tailed Student t-test was used to determine whether differences between the digital and paper measurement platforms exceeded 14% (P < 0.05). Results: A significant difference in scores was found between the mobile phone–based (32.9% ± 0.4%) and both the laptop computer– and paper-based platforms (31.0% ± 0.4%, P < 0.01 for both). These differences were not clinically relevant (minimal clinically important difference <1.4 cm). No statistically significant difference was observed between the paper and laptop computer platforms. Measurement agreement was found between the paper- and laptop computer–based platforms (mean difference, 0.0% ± 0.5%; no proportional bias detected) but not between the paper- and mobile phone–based platforms (mean difference, 1.9% ± 0.5%; proportional bias detected). Conclusion: No clinically relevant difference exists between the traditional paper-based VAS assessment and VAS scores obtained from laptop computer– and mobile phone–based platforms.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. JAAOS Global Research and Reviews, 2018 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Farmakoloji (Tıp)
PharmacologyMedicine