PLoS ONE· 2014Q1· Derleme
Strok Sonrası Fizik Tedavi: Göreve Özgü Eğitim İçin Güçlü Kanıtlar
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 1.217atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2014yıl
Kısa özet
467 RKÇ'nin (N=25373) sistematik bir incelemesi ve meta-analizi, inme sonrası 13 yürüyüş, 11 kol-el, 1 ADL ve 3 fiziksel uygunluk müdahalesi için güçlü kanıtlar buldu.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- İnme sonrası 13 yürüyüş, 11 kol-el, 1 ADL ve 3 fiziksel uygunluk müdahalesi için güçlü kanıtlar desteklenmektedir.
- Daha yüksek dozda fizik tedavi pratiği daha iyi sonuçlarla ilişkilidir.
- Müdahalelerin etkileri büyük ölçüde eğitilen fonksiyonlar ve aktivitelerle sınırlıdır.
- İnme sonrası zamanlama, 10 müdahalenin etkinliğini önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PT in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved through a systematic search. Outcomes were classified according to the ICF. RCTs with a low risk of bias were quantitatively analyzed. Differences between phases poststroke were explored in subgroup analyses. A best evidence synthesis was performed for neurological treatment approaches. The search yielded 467 RCTs (N = 25373; median PEDro score 6 [IQR 5-7]), identifying 53 interventions. No adverse events were reported. Strong evidence was found for significant positive effects of 13 interventions related to gait, 11 interventions related to arm-hand activities, 1 intervention for ADL, and 3 interventions for physical fitness. Summary Effect Sizes (SESs) ranged from 0.17 (95%CI 0.03-0.70; I(2) = 0%) for therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm to 2.47 (95%CI 0.84-4.11; I(2) = 77%) for training of sitting balance. There is strong evidence that a higher dose of practice is better, with SESs ranging from 0.21 (95%CI 0.02-0.39; I(2) = 6%) for motor function of the paretic arm to 0.61 (95%CI 0.41-0.82; I(2) = 41%) for muscle strength of the paretic leg. Subgroup analyses yielded significant differences with respect to timing poststroke for 10 interventions. Neurological treatment approaches to training of body functions and activities showed equal or unfavorable effects when compared to other training interventions. Main limitations of the present review are not using individual patient data for meta-analyses and absence of correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence for PT interventions favoring intensive high repetitive task-oriented and task-specific training in all phases poststroke. Effects are mostly restricted to the actually trained functions and activities. Suggestions for prioritizing PT stroke research are given.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. PLoS ONE, 2014 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Rehabilitasyon
RehabilitationMedicine