PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

Frontiers in Education· 2026Q1

Üst Sıradaki Üniversitelerde Akademik Kadro Terfilerinde Hakemlik Katkılarının Yetersiz Temsili

Peer review contributions as a measure of academic distinction requirements of faculty promotion committees: rapid review of top-ranking universities

Tamer A. El-Sobky, Sherif Ahmed Kamel, Shady Mahmoud

Kısa özet

En iyi sıralamaya sahip üniversitelerin yalnızca %36'sı, bunların %93'ü ise sadece makale hakemliği veya editörlük rollerine odaklanarak, akademik terfi kriterlerinde hakemlik katkılarını açıkça belirtmektedir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • En iyi sıralamaya sahip 42 üniversiteden yalnızca 15'i (%36) akademik kadro terfi kriterlerinde açıkça hakemliği belirtmektedir.
  • Hakemliği dahil eden üniversitelerden 14'ü (%93) makale hakemliği veya editörlük kurulu katılımına odaklanmaktadır.
  • Sadece bir üniversite, hakemliği eğitim veya mentorluk bağlamında belirtmiştir.
  • Çalışma, QS World University Rankings 2025'e göre en iyi 50 üniversitenin terfi yönergelerini incelemiştir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

Introduction Journal peer review expertise is a cornerstone of academic practice. However, research publication productivity often overshadows prepublication peer review as a marker of academic distinction. The objective of this review is to examine the status of peer review contributions as a criterion of academic performance within faculty promotion committees at leading universities. Methods We reviewed handbooks, guidelines, and procedures related to faculty promotion and tenure on the official websites of the top 50 universities ranked by the QS World University Rankings 2025. Peer review, as a requirement of academic promotion, was identified and reported if it fell within the scope of, a) peer review reporting or authoring, b) peer review education or mentoring, or c) peer review training or learning. The primary assessment criteria governing academic promotion were reported. Results Eight universities were excluded due to unavailable or inaccessible information on their websites, and 42 were included in the final analysis. Only 15 (36%) of the included top-ranking universities explicitly mentioned peer review as a criterion for assessing academic distinction. Of the 15 universities, 14 (93%) mentioned peer review in the context of peer review reporting or authoring such as peer reviewing of scientific manuscripts, sitting on editorial boards of major journals, and participation on peer review grant panels. Only 1 (2%) university mentioned peer review in the context of peer review education or mentoring. Discussion Peer review contributions as a measure of academic distinction requirements of faculty promotion committees in top ranking universities are underrepresented and underrated. Faculty promotion committees are urged to reconsider the relative weight of peer review contributions in the promotion review process.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Frontiers in Education, 2026 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarPremium
Makaleye SorÜcretsiz hesapla

Ücretsiz hesapla devam et

Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.

Web'de ücretsiz devam et

Google ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.

Telefonda:

Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences