BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders· 2012Q2
Diz Dejenerasyonu İçin Trombositten Zengin Plazma (PRP) vs. Hyaluronik Asit: Karışık Sonuçlar
Platelet-rich plasma vs hyaluronic acid to treat knee degenerative pathology: study design and preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial
- 389atıf
- Q2SCImago
- 2012yıl
Kısa özet
Rastgeleleştirilmiş bir deneme, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) ve Hyaluronik Asit (HA) enjeksiyonlarının orta dereceli osteoartritli (OA) hastalarda 12 ayda diz ağrısı ve fonksiyonunu iyileştirdiğini, ancak aralarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığını buldu. PRP, düşük dereceli dejenerasyonda (Kellgren-Lawrence skoru ≤ 2) daha iyi sonuçlar için bir eğilim gösterdi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Orta dereceli diz OA'lı hastalarda hem PRP hem de HA enjeksiyonları 12 ayda diz fonksiyonunu ve ağrı skorlarını iyileştirdi.
- PRP ve HA grupları arasında klinik sonuçlarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi.
- PRP, düşük dereceli diz dejenerasyonu olan hastalarda (Kellgren-Lawrence skoru ≤ 2) daha iyi sonuçlar için bir eğilim gösterdi.
- PRP enjeksiyonları, HA'ya kıyasla daha yüksek oranda hafif enjeksiyon sonrası ağrı ile ilişkilendirildi.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma (PRP), a blood-derived product rich in growth factors, is a promising treatment for cartilage defects but there is still a lack of clinical evidence. The aim of this study is to show, through a randomized double blind prospective trial, the efficacy of this procedure, by comparing PRP to Hyaluronic Acid (HA) injections for the treatment of knee chondropathy or osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: 109 patients (55 treated with HA and 54 with PRP) were treated and evaluated at 12 months of follow-up. The patients were enrolled according to the following inclusion criteria: age > 18 years, history of chronic (at least 4 months) pain or swelling of the knee and imaging findings of degenerative changes of the joint (Kellgren-Lawrence Score up to 3). A cycle of 3 weekly injections was administered blindly. All patients were prospectively evaluated before and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the treatment by: IKDC, EQ-VAS, TEGNER, and KOOS scores. Range of motion and knee circumference changes were measured over time. Adverse events and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: Only minor adverse events were detected in some patients, such as mild pain and effusion after the injections, in particular in the PRP group, where a significantly higher post-injective pain reaction was observed (p=0.039). At the follow-up evaluations, both groups presented a clinical improvement but the comparison between the two groups showed a not statistically significant difference in all scores evaluated. A trend favorable for the PRP group was only found in patients with low grade articular degeneration (Kellgren-Lawrence score up to 2). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that PRP injections offer a significant clinical improvement up to one year of follow-up. However, conversely to what was shown by the current literature, for middle-aged patients with moderate signs of OA, PRP results were not better than those obtained with HA injections, and thus it should not be considered as first line treatment. More promising results are shown for its use in low grade degeneration, but they still have to be confirmed.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2012 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Üroloji
UrologyMedicine