Sevgi mi Hukuk mu: Orta Çağ İngiliz Anlaşmazlık Çözümünün Viking Temelleri

Özet (abstract)

Abstract In prominent legal historical works, Michael Clanchy and Stephen D. White constructed an important paradigm for medieval dispute settlement by adapting the phrase “law and love” from the Anglo-Norman Leges Henrici Primi . Yet, rarely has this aphorism’s background been explored. This article argues that “love or law” has roots in Viking-Age Scandinavia, where this Old Norse terminology represented a unique dynamic of dispute resolution revolving around harsh “law” pressuring parties to make “love” settlements outside of court. Contrasting sharply with Anglo-Saxon disputing norms centered on formal compensation tariffs, “love or law” found its way to England’s tenth-century Danelaw, first recorded in the Wantage Code. This alliterative pair continues in English writings, while “love-days” become a major cultural feature, and more broadly, the dynamic of threateningly punitive “law” inducing “love” agreements appears in action within early common law case records. In ways that recollect Icelandic and Danelaw practices, negotiated compensation occurring “under the shadow of law” may have been a major feature of medieval English dispute as hinted by our surviving sources. Scandinavian dispute concepts, occasionally coined by unique “love or law” vocabulary, may have had a subtle yet profound influence on some of the grounding assumptions of English common law.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. Law and History Review, 2026 · DOI ↗