BMC Bioinformatics· 2026Q1
TCM-Complexity: a complexity-aware hybrid active learning framework for drug–target interaction prediction
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
TCM-Complexity, a novel active learning framework, improves drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction by incorporating the local structural complexity of candidate samples alongside model uncertainty, outperforming existing methods under limited annotation budgets.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- TCM-Complexity is a novel active learning framework for DTI prediction that considers sample structural complexity.
- The framework constructs a joint drug-target embedding space to characterize local structural complexity.
- It uses a two-stage strategy integrating model prediction and data structural characteristics for sample selection.
- Experiments on DAVIS, BioSNAP, and TCMSP datasets showed superior performance under limited annotation budgets (20% of training pool).
- TCM-Complexity achieved up to 1.87% improvement in ROC_AUC and 1.79% in PR_AUC compared to the strongest baseline (TCM).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Drug–target interaction (DTI) prediction is an essential task in computer-aided drug discovery and pharmacological mechanism elucidation. High-quality DTI annotations typically rely on costly wet-lab experiments, and limited experimental resources make it difficult to obtain large-scale, reliable labeled datasets. Therefore, effectively assessing the utility of candidate samples and improving data utilization efficiency under limited annotation budgets remain critical challenges. Active learning offers a promising solution to reduce annotation costs; however, existing methods mainly focus on model prediction uncertainty or sample distribution characteristics and do not fully exploit the latent structural information embedded in complex biological representation spaces. To address these limitations, we propose TCM-Complexity, a complexity-aware and stage-adaptive active learning framework for DTI prediction. The framework constructs a joint drug–target embedding space to characterize the local structural complexity of candidate samples and incorporates this information as a novel sample selection criterion. By integrating model prediction information with data structural characteristics, a two-stage exploration–mining strategy is developed to dynamically optimize sample selection across different learning stages. Experimental evaluations on three public DTI datasets, namely DAVIS, BioSNAP, and TCMSP, showed that TCM-Complexity achieved the best overall performance across most evaluated metrics in the primary random-split experiments under a labeling budget corresponding to 20% of the training pool. Compared with the strongest baseline, TCM, the maximum observed improvements were 1.87% in ROC_AUC and 1.79% in PR_AUC. The proposed method also achieved more than 90% of the predictive performance of the fully supervised models across the evaluated settings, with the maximum relative performance approaching 98%. Additional cold-drug, cold-target, and multi-seed analyses indicated that the magnitude of the performance advantage was dataset- and metric-dependent. TCM-Complexity can improve DTI prediction performance and sample utilization efficiency under the evaluated limited-annotation settings. By jointly considering model prediction information and the local structural complexity of candidate samples, the proposed framework provides a complementary structure-aware active-learning strategy for computational drug discovery under constrained annotation resources.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Bioinformatics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Computational Theory and Mathematics
Computational Theory and MathematicsComputer Science