PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Cities· 2026Q1

Governing through incompletion: Diaspora-funded infrastructure and urban governance in South Lebanon

Hucen Sleiman

Short summary

Diaspora-funded infrastructure in South Lebanon, characterized by material and operational incompletion, sustains a persistent mode of urban governance marked by deferred functionality, moralized access, and dispersed accountability, rather than merely compensating for state gaps.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Diaspora-funded infrastructure in South Lebanon is often materially and operationally incomplete.
  • This incompletion sustains a persistent mode of governance, not a temporary failure.
  • Key characteristics of this governance include deferred functionality, moralized access, and dispersed accountability.
  • The study draws on urban ethnography, 17 interviews, and architectural surveys in Tyre, Jouwaya, and Abbassieh.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Urban reconstruction in conflict-affected regions is commonly understood through narratives of state failure, humanitarian substitution, or post-war planning. Less attention has been paid to how urban governance is exercised through infrastructures that remain neither fully completed nor entirely absent. Drawing on qualitative urban research conducted between 2022 and 2024, this study examines how diaspora-funded housing and collective facilities shape everyday urban governance in South Lebanon under conditions of partial and selective state planning. Based on urban ethnography, 17 semi-structured interviews, and a structured architectural survey across the city of Tyre and the towns of Jouwaya and Abbassieh, the analysis shows that diaspora-funded infrastructures do not simply compensate for gaps in public provision. Under conditions of fragmented responsibility, their material and operational incompletion can sustain a persistent mode of governance characterised by deferred functionality, moralised access, and dispersed accountability, through which authority, obligation, and responsibility are spatially organised. By conceptualising incompletion as an emergent governing relation rather than a transitional failure, the study contributes to debates on urban governance, infrastructure, and planning in post-conflict and diasporic contexts.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cities, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences