Frontiers in Medical Technology· 2026Q1
A data-driven and interpretable hybrid quantum-classical model for male infertility risk assessment
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A novel Quantum LSTM model, embedding a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) within its gating mechanism, achieved 93.8% accuracy in predicting male infertility risk from EHR data, a statistically significant improvement over classical LSTMs (92.1%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A novel Quantum LSTM model integrating a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) was developed for male infertility risk assessment.
- The Quantum LSTM achieved 93.8% accuracy on EHR-derived male fertility data (n=100), outperforming classical LSTMs (92.1%).
- SHAP analysis identified daily sitting duration and age as the most influential predictors of male fertility outcomes.
- The model demonstrated feasibility for quantum-enhanced sequential learning on small, heterogeneous healthcare datasets.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Introduction Nearly 15% of couples worldwide experience infertility, with Male Infertility (MI) accounting for 30–50% of these cases. Despite this burden, research on MI lags behind female infertility, particularly in understanding how demographic, clinical, lifestyle, and environmental factors interact to shape reproductive outcomes. Traditional approaches typically examine isolated indicators and struggle to capture the high-dimensional, nonlinear patterns present in Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. This study proposes a data-driven, interpretable framework integrating global fertility rate trends with EHR-derived male fertility data to (i) identify key determinants of MI, (ii) compare multiple classical Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures against a novel Quantum LSTM model embedding a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) directly within the LSTM gating mechanism, and (iii) evaluate the feasibility of quantum-enhanced sequential learning on small, heterogeneous healthcare datasets. Methods Two public datasets were used: a global fertility rate time series (1960–2020) and an EHR–derived male fertility dataset ( n = 100, 10 features). After preprocessing (scaling, encoding, multicollinearity checks, and class-imbalance correction), several classical LSTM variants and the proposed Quantum LSTM were trained and validated using 5-fold cross-validation, repeated random train–test splits, and bootstrap resampling. Performance was assessed via accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational time, with statistical significance evaluated using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was applied for feature-level and model-level interpretability. Results Among classical models, unilateral LSTM performed most consistently (91.2% accuracy on fertility-rate data; 92.1% on male-fertility data). The Quantum LSTM achieved the highest accuracy on both datasets (92.6% and 93.8% respectively), a modest but statistically significant improvement (Wilcoxon p = 0.031 and p = 0.024; Cohen's d = 0.42–0.48) with narrower bootstrap confidence intervals, indicating greater stability. SHAP analysis identified daily sitting duration and age as the most influential predictors of male fertility outcomes, followed by season and alcohol consumption frequency, with clinical history variables contributing comparatively less. Discussion These findings demonstrate the feasibility of embedding quantum circuits within LSTM gating for small-scale healthcare prediction tasks, yielding incremental rather than transformative gains over classical architectures. Observed associations are exploratory and non-causal, and given the limited sample size ( n = 100), single-center source, and simulator-based quantum execution, results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than clinically conclusive. This work establishes a reproducible benchmarking framework combining classical and quantum-enhanced LSTM models with SHAP-based explainability for early MI risk stratification; future work should validate findings on larger, multi-center cohorts and real quantum hardware.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Information Management
Health Information ManagementHealth Professions