Journal of Applied Crystallography· 2014Q1
Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination
- 4,831citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
Silver (Ag) Kα radiation offers advantages over molybdenum (Mo) for single-crystal X-ray diffraction, particularly when heavy elements are present, enabling final R1 values below 1% in several cases.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Silver Kα radiation is advantageous for single-crystal structure determination when heavy elements are involved.
- Empirical absorption corrections (SADABS) are effective for microfocus X-ray beams, compensating for irradiated volume variations.
- Final R1 values below 1% were achieved in three out of six model compounds studied.
- Numerical absorption correction methods may need revision for highly focused microfocus beams.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The quality of diffraction data obtained using silver and molybdenum microsources has been compared for six model compounds with a wide range of absorption factors. The experiments were performed on two 30 W air-cooled Incoatec IµS microfocus sources with multilayer optics mounted on a Bruker D8 goniometer with a SMART APEX II CCD detector. All data were analysed, processed and refined using standard Bruker software. The results show that Ag K α radiation can be beneficial when heavy elements are involved. A numerical absorption correction based on the positions and indices of the crystal faces is shown to be of limited use for the highly focused microsource beams, presumably because the assumption that the crystal is completely bathed in a (top-hat profile) beam of uniform intensity is no longer valid. Fortunately the empirical corrections implemented in SADABS , although originally intended as a correction for absorption, also correct rather well for the variations in the effective volume of the crystal irradiated. In three of the cases studied (two Ag and one Mo) the final SHELXL R 1 against all data after application of empirical corrections implemented in SADABS was below 1%. Since such corrections are designed to optimize the agreement of the intensities of equivalent reflections with different paths through the crystal but the same Bragg 2θ angles, a further correction is required for the 2θ dependence of the absorption. For this, SADABS uses the transmission factor of a spherical crystal with a user-defined value of μ r (where μ is the linear absorption coefficient and r is the effective radius of the crystal); the best results are obtained when r is biased towards the smallest crystal dimension. The results presented here suggest that the IUCr publication requirement that a numerical absorption correction must be applied for strongly absorbing crystals is in need of revision.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Radiation
RadiationPhysics and Astronomy