PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Clinical Pharmacokinetics· 2026Q1

Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz in Pregnancy and Postpartum with and Without First-line Tuberculosis Drugs: Results from IMPAACT P1026s

Marije Van Schalkwyk, Jiajia Wang, Adrie Bekker, Eric H. Decloedt et al.

Short summary

Pregnant women with HIV and drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB) on efavirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) showed 19% lower EFV exposure (AUC0-24) in the third trimester compared to postpartum, with 38% not meeting therapeutic targets.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Third-trimester EFV exposure was 19% lower (AUC0-24) in pregnant women with HIV and TB compared to postpartum.
  • Apparent oral clearance of EFV was 24% higher in the third trimester compared to postpartum.
  • 38% of pregnant women with HIV and TB did not meet target EFV AUC0-24 or Cmin.
  • Pregnant women with HIV but without TB showed similar EFV exposure in pregnancy and postpartum.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics (PK) may be influenced by both pregnancy-related physiological changes and concurrent treatment for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB), and intensive 24-h EFV PK data during rifampin (RIF)/ isoniazid (INH) treatment in pregnant women living with HIV (PWLHIV) and TB disease are lacking. We evaluated EFV PK in a prospective cohort of PWLHIV receiving WHO-recommended oral daily EFV alongside RIF and INH (with or without ethambutol [EMB] and pyrazinamide [PZA]). Participants enrolled between 20 and 37+6 weeks gestation and underwent steady-state intensive 24-h PK sampling during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2–8 weeks postpartum (PP) when eligible. PK parameters (AUC0–24, Cmax, Cmin and CL/F) were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and paired comparisons across pregnancy stages were made using geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals (CI); α = 0.10. PK outcomes were compared with a previously published cohort of PWLHIV without TB and evaluated against protocol-defined therapeutic targets. Of 22 participants, PK data were available for 12, 21 and 13 participants in 2T, 3T and PP, respectively. In 3T (3T↔PP: n = 13), EFV exposure was lower than PP: AUC0–24 was 19% lower (GMR 0.81 [0.69–0.95]; p = 0.008), Cmax 16% lower (GMR 0.84 [0.76–0.94]; p = 0.033), Cmin 25% lower (GMR 0.75 [0.63–0.90]; p = 0.003), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) 24% higher (GMR 1.24 [1.06–1.46]; p = 0.057). 2T GMRs were directionally similar to 3T but were underpowered (2T↔PP: n = 4). Although median EFV concentrations exceeded therapeutic thresholds, 38% of participants did not meet target AUC0–24 or Cmin. In contrast, in the non-TB group, the EFV AUC0–24 and Cmax were similar in pregnancy and postpartum (3T AUC0–24 GMR 0.94 [0.86–1.02]; p = 0.373 and Cmax GMR 1.07 [0.95–1. 02]; p = 0.167). No infants acquired HIV during follow-up. Late pregnancy combined with DS-TB treatment is associated with lower EFV exposure. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, but frequent viral load monitoring is advised in PWLHIV with TB disease receiving EFV-based antiretroviral treatment. NCT00042289. Pregnant women on both efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment and tuberculosis treatment had lower efavirenz concentrations in the third trimester compared with postpartum and almost 40% of participants did not reach minimum target concentrations. Pregnant women without tuberculosis had the same efavirenz concentrations in pregnancy and postpartum. As the clinical implications are still unclear, it is advisable to evaluate viral suppression frequently when managing pregnant women on efavirenz and concurrent TB treatment.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Infectious Diseases

Infectious DiseasesMedicine