PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Children· 2026Q1

Maxillary Labial Frenulum Morphology and Maxillary Anterior Dental Caries in Children: A Scoping Review

Mehmet Ali Tuna, Faezeh Naderlou, Ufuk Kesmez, Ayşegül Aydın Tanas et al.

Short summary

A scoping review of six studies (1659 children) found limited, heterogeneous evidence for a link between maxillary labial frenulum (MLF) morphology and anterior tooth caries, concluding MLF attachment is not a reliable standalone caries risk marker.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Six cross-sectional studies involving 1659 children (6 months–16 years) were included.
  • Five studies used the Placek classification or equivalent, and one used the Kotlow scale for MLF morphology.
  • Three studies reported bivariate differences without a consistent gradient, while three found no significant association.
  • The only adjusted analysis found no significant difference in caries risk based on MLF attachment category.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The relationship between maxillary labial frenulum (MLF) morphology and caries of the adjacent maxillary anterior teeth remains uncertain. This scoping review mapped the available evidence in children. Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance and PRISMA-ScR, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and TR Dizin were searched up to August 2026, plus reference lists. Analytical studies in participants under 18 years of age were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened records and verified charted data; included studies were appraised post hoc using the JBI analytical cross-sectional checklist. Results: Of 68 unique records, six cross-sectional studies (1659 participants aged 6 months–16 years) were included. Five used the Placek classification or an equivalent and one the Kotlow scale; caries outcomes ranged from approximal lesions to ICDAS-based severity. Three studies reported bivariate differences without a consistent gradient, whereas three found no significant association. In the only adjusted analysis, no attachment category differed significantly from the mucosal reference; the others were unadjusted. Conclusions: Evidence is limited and heterogeneous. MLF attachment should not be used as a stand-alone caries risk marker. Current evidence does not support recommending frenectomy solely for the purpose of preventing maxillary anterior caries; this reflects insufficient evidence of benefit rather than evidence of ineffectiveness. Prospective studies with standardized anatomical and functional assessments are needed.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Children, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Speech and Hearing

Speech and HearingHealth Professions