The Journal of Development Studies· 2020Q1
Rural Youth Welfare along the Rural-urban Gradient: An Empirical Analysis across the Developing World
- 17citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2020year
Short summary
Rural youth welfare is shaped by commercial potential, not agricultural potential, with households facing income and poverty penalties for having young members, especially in areas with low commercialization.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Rural youth populations are stable or declining globally, except in Africa where numbers are projected to double in 40 years.
- Two-thirds of rural youth live in areas with high agricultural potential, and one-quarter also have high commercial potential.
- Commercial potential of rural spaces significantly impacts welfare outcomes, whereas agricultural potential does not.
- Households with young members face income and poverty penalties, which decrease with rising commercial potential.
- Younger household members receive lower relative returns on education.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
We use survey data on 170,000 households from Asia, Latin America and Africa, global geo-spatial data, and an economic geography framework to highlight five findings about rural youth in developing countries. First, the youth share in population is falling rapidly, and youth numbers are stable or falling slowly everywhere, except in Africa. In Africa, youth share is rising very slowly, but numbers are set to double in 40 years. Second, large majorities of rural youth live in spaces that are not inherently limiting: two-thirds live in zones with highest agricultural potential, and one-quarter combine this with highest commercialisation potential. The 4% that do live in inherently challenging spaces are concentrated in pockets of persistent poverty in middle-income countries. Third, rural spaces’ commercial potential has large impacts on welfare outcomes, but their agricultural potential has no detectable impact. Fourth, households with young members face income- and poverty ‘penalties’ in all regions and spaces within them, compared to households without young members. The poverty penalty declines sharply over space as commercial potential rises, but the income penalty shows ambiguous patterns. Fifth, households with young members earn lower relative returns to education, with varying patterns over space.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Journal of Development Studies, 2020 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sociology and Political Science
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences