PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Radiotherapy and Oncology· 2017Q1

Phase I trial of stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for the treatment of oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies of the abdomen

Lauren E. Henke, Rojano Kashani, Clifford G. Robinson, Austen Curcuru et al.

Short summary

A Phase I trial found stereotactic MR-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) to be feasible and safe for abdominal malignancies, enabling dose escalation or improved organ-at-risk sparing in 81% of fractions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • SMART radiation therapy was tested in 20 patients with abdominal malignancies.
  • Online adaptive plans were created for 81% of treatment fractions.
  • Adaptations were driven by organ-at-risk constraints (61%) or dose escalation opportunities (20%).
  • No Grade ≥ 3 acute treatment-related toxicities were observed.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: SBRT is used to treat oligometastatic or unresectable primary abdominal malignancies, although ablative dose delivery is limited by proximity of organs-at-risk (OAR). Stereotactic, magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) may improve SBRT's therapeutic ratio. This prospective Phase I trial assessed feasibility and potential advantages of SMART to treat abdominal malignancies. MATERIALS/METHODS: Twenty patients with oligometastatic or unresectable primary liver (n = 10) and non-liver (n = 10) abdominal malignancies underwent SMART. Initial plans prescribed 50 Gy/5 fractions (BED 100 Gy) with goal 95% PTV coverage by 95% of prescription, subject to hard OAR constraints. Daily real-time online-adaptive plans were created as needed, based on daily setup MR-image-set tumor/OAR "anatomy-of-the-day" to preserve hard OAR constraints, escalate PTV dose, or both. Treatment times, patient outcomes, and dosimetric comparisons between initial and adaptive plans were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Online adaptive plans were created at time of treatment for 81/97 fractions, due to initial plan violation of OAR constraints (61/97) or observed opportunity for PTV dose escalation (20/97). Plan adaptation increased PTV coverage in 64/97 fractions. Zero Grade ≥ 3 acute (<6 months) treatment-related toxicities were observed. DISCUSSION: SMART is clinically deliverable and safe, allowing PTV dose escalation and/or simultaneous OAR sparing compared to non-adaptive abdominal SBRT.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiation

RadiationPhysics and Astronomy