Antibiotics· 2026Q1
Post-Marketing Reporting Patterns of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Ceftolozane–Tazobactam: Analysis of Adverse Event Reports from EudraVigilance
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) showed higher reporting of serious adverse events, including hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders, compared to ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT) in EudraVigilance data (n=1414). CT had proportionally higher fatal outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 1414 adverse event reports analyzed from EudraVigilance for ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT).
- CA had a higher proportion of serious reports (91.0%) compared to CT (78.7%).
- CA showed increased reporting for hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders.
- CT had a higher proportion of fatal outcomes (21.0%) compared to CA (12.8%).
- Specific adverse events with higher reporting for CA included encephalopathy and decreased platelet count.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (CT) are WHO Reserve-group antibiotics increasingly used for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. Comparative post-marketing pharmacovigilance data remain limited. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) retrieved from the EudraVigilance database. Reports listing CA or CT as suspected drugs were included. Comparative reporting analyses were performed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) levels. Results: A total of 1414 ICSRs were identified (CA: 967; CT: 447). Serious reports were more frequent for CA than CT (91.0% vs. 78.7%), whereas fatal outcomes were proportionally higher for CT (21.0% vs. 12.8%). At the SOC level, CA showed higher reporting for hepatobiliary disorders (ROR 2.00; 95% CI 1.20–3.35), investigations (ROR 2.67; 95% CI 1.92–3.71), nervous system disorders (ROR 1.51; 95% CI 1.07–2.15), and psychiatric disorders (ROR 3.25; 95% CI 1.37–7.72). At the PT level, CA showed higher reporting for encephalopathy (ROR 4.25; 95% CI 1.28–14.09), blood creatinine increased (ROR 7.37; 95% CI 1.76–30.93), platelet count decreased (ROR 26.9; 95% CI 3.71–195.0), and diarrhoea (ROR 2.83; 95% CI 1.09–7.34). Death was less frequently reported for CA relative to CT (ROR 0.17; 95% CI 0.10–0.29). Conclusions: This EudraVigilance-based analysis identified distinct reporting patterns for CA and CT. CA showed higher reporting for neurological, hepatobiliary, and laboratory-related events, whereas CT reports more frequently involved infection-related contexts. These findings support continued post-marketing surveillance, while clinical monitoring should follow established clinical guidance and product information.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Antibiotics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
ToxicologyPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics