INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago)· 2018
Power-law distributions in empirical data
- 6,799citations
- 2018year
Short summary
This paper introduces improved statistical techniques for accurately identifying and characterizing power-law distributions in real-world data, overcoming limitations of standard methods like least-squares fitting.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Standard least-squares fitting for power laws is systematically biased.
- Maximum likelihood and Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics offer accurate parameter estimation.
- Quantitative measures are provided to rigorously test power-law fit.
- Methods were applied to 24 real-world datasets, validating or refuting prior conjectures.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Power-law distributions occur in many situations of scientific interest and have significant consequences for our understanding of natural and man-made phenomena. Unfortunately, the empirical detection and characterization of power laws is made difficult by the large fluctuations that occur in the tail of the distribution. In particular, standard methods such as least-squares fitting are known to produce systematically biased estimates of parameters for power-law distributions and should not be used in most circumstances. Here we describe statistical techniques for making accurate parameter estimates for power-law data, based on maximum likelihood methods and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. We also show how to tell whether the data follow a power-law distribution at at all, defining quantitative measures that indicate when the power law is a reasonable fit to the data and when it is not. We demonstrate these methods by applying them to twenty-four real-world data sets from a range of different disciplines. Each of the data sets has been conjectured previously to follow a power-law distribution. In some cases we find these conjectures to be consistent with the data while in others the power law is ruled out.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago), 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Statistical and Nonlinear PhysicsPhysics and Astronomy