PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Management Science· 2025Q1

Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Collaboration with Humans: Automation, Augmentation, and the Future of Work

Andreas Fügener, Dominik D. Walzner, Alok Kumar Gupta

Short summary

An analytical framework shows optimal AI use (automation or augmentation) depends on task complementarity: automation rises with between-task complementarity, while augmentation rises with within-task complementarity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Optimal AI use (automation vs. augmentation) depends on task complementarity.
  • Between-task complementarity drives AI automation.
  • Within-task complementarity drives AI augmentation.
  • Empirical validation shows AI automates easy tasks, augments mid-difficulty tasks, and humans handle difficult tasks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Humans will see significant changes in the future of work as collaboration with artificial intelligence (AI) will become commonplace. This work explores the benefits of AI in the setting of judgment tasks when it replaces humans (automation) and when it works with humans (augmentation). Through an analytical modeling framework, we show that the optimal use of AI for automation or augmentation depends on different types of human-AI complementarity. Our analysis demonstrates that the use of automation increases with higher levels of between-task complementarity. In contrast, the use of augmentation increases with higher levels of within-task complementarity. We integrate both automation and augmentation roles into our task allocation framework, where an AI and humans work on a set of judgment tasks to optimize performance with a given level of available human resources. We validate our framework with an empirical study based on experimental data in which humans classify images with and without AI support. When between-task complementarity and within-task complementarity exist, we see a consistent distribution of work pattern for optimal work configurations; AI automates relatively easy tasks, AI augments humans on tasks with similar human and AI performance, and humans work without AI on relatively difficult tasks. Our work provides several contributions to theory and practice. The findings on the effects of complementarity provide a nuanced view regarding the benefits of automation and augmentation. Our task allocation framework highlights potential job designs for the future of work, especially by considering the often-ignored, critical role of human resource reallocation in improving organizational performance. This paper was accepted by D. J. Wu, Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684 .

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Management Science, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology