PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Psychotherapy· 2026Q1

Struggling for resonance: Mediopassive interaction in a long-term treatment of severe personality disorder.

Christian Sell, Stefan Pfänder

Short summary

Long-term psychotherapy for severe personality disorders shows increased interactional resonance and mediopassive agency as distress decreases over time.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • High-distress therapy sessions for severe personality disorders had lower interactional resonance compared to lower-distress sessions.
  • Lower-distress sessions were characterized by increased mediopassive interactions, indicating joint, stepwise meaning construction.
  • A shift from high to lower distress in therapy correlated with an increase in interactional resonance.
  • The study used multimodal conversation analysis of 10 therapy sessions (5 high-distress, 5 low-distress).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Although clinicians often report significant emotional challenges in psychotherapy for personality disorders, we still know relatively little about how these difficulties are enacted and reorganized in moment-to-moment patient-therapist interaction. We examine whether interactional resonance and mediopassive agency can help illuminate relational difficulties and change in a good-outcome long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy involving a patient with severe interpersonal pathology, chronic depressive symptoms, and somatic complaints. The patient met the diagnostic criteria for borderline and avoidant personality disorders, as well as depressive and somatic symptom disorders. For much of the treatment, the therapist described sessions as highly distressing. Over time, sessions were experienced as less distressing and more productive. We examined whether this shift could be accounted for by changes in how patient and therapist took up and developed each other's contributions in interaction. Following a preliminary screening of therapist reports, case notes, and session recordings, we selected 10 sessions for multimodal conversation analysis. Using exploratory conversation analysis, we specified analytic indicators for interactional resonance and then compared five high-distress sessions with five lower distress sessions. High-distress sessions showed lower interactional resonance, whereas lower distress sessions showed higher resonance. In lower distress sessions, patient and therapist more often engaged in mediopassive interactions-that is, they jointly participated in the stepwise construction of meaning across turns. Psychotherapy for severe interpersonal pathology may involve working with persistently low levels of interactional resonance that constrain spontaneous, collaborative meaning-making. The findings further suggest that a dyad's capacity for interactional resonance may increase over the course of long-term treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Psychotherapy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Psychology

Clinical PsychologyPsychology