Computers in Human Behavior Reports· 2025Q1
Generative artificial intelligence dependency: Scale development, validation, and its motivational, behavioral, and psychological correlates
- 54citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2025year
Short summary
A new six-study, 1,333-participant Generative AI Dependency Scale (GADS) reveals dependency is linked to lower psychological needs, increased procrastination, and reduced self-concept clarity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The Generative AI Dependency Scale (GADS) was developed and validated across 1,333 participants in six studies.
- GADS has a stable three-factor structure (cognitive preoccupation, negative consequences, withdrawal) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = .87).
- Dependency correlates with lower psychological need satisfaction, increased procrastination, and reduced self-concept clarity.
- Scalar measurement invariance was established across sex and cultures.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
As generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into daily life, concerns have emerged about growing dependency on AI and its potential psychological and behavioral consequences. The present research develops and validates the Generative AI Dependency Scale, a multidimensional tool developed to assess individual differences in dependency on generative AI systems. Across six studies involving 1,333 participants from the United States and Singapore, the Generative AI Dependency Scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including a stable three-factor structure (cognitive preoccupation, negative consequences, withdrawal) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = .87). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a higher-order dependency construct, and scalar measurement invariance was established across sex and cultures. Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated through associations with an existing AI addiction scale and the Big Five personality traits respectively. Generative AI dependency was also significantly associated with a range of motivational (e.g., lower basic psychological need satisfaction, greater fear of missing out), behavioral (e.g., increased procrastination and cognitive failures, lower task performance and critical thinking), and psychological (e.g., reduced self-concept clarity, greater loneliness) outcomes. Framed within Goodman’s behavioral dependency framework and self-determination theory, these findings suggest that generative AI dependency reflects not merely excessive technology use, but a deeper misalignment between psychological needs and the strategies employed to meet them. The Generative AI Dependency Scale offers a psychometrically robust foundation for future research into the impacts of generative AI, with implications for responsible AI design and use.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2025 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sociology and Political Science
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences