Functional Plant Biology· 2026Q1
Evaluating genotype-specific responses in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) to late-spring frost conditions
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Wheat genotype Superhead showed greater adaptability to late-spring frost (LSF) stress during reproductive stages compared to Roshan, which was more sensitive, with Superhead exhibiting higher proline and photosynthetic pigment levels.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Wheat genotype Superhead is more adaptable to late-spring frost than genotype Roshan.
- Proline accumulation and increased photosynthetic pigments are potential stress tolerance mechanisms.
- LSF stress negatively correlates with yield-related traits like grain number and weight.
- Genotype and growth stage significantly influence wheat responses to frost stress.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of late-spring frost (LSF) stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum) through critical reproductive stages. A factorial experiment was conducted with three wheat genotypes (Roshan, Falat, and Superhead), at three growth stages (pollen development, spike emergence, and anthesis), and with three frost stress durations (control, 1 day of stress, and 4 days of stress) in a completely randomised design with nine replications. Analysis of variance and mean comparison using the l.s.d. method showed that wheat varieties responded differently to growth stages and stress durations, with genotype Roshan being more sensitive and genotype Superhead being more adaptable. Proline accumulation and increased photosynthetic pigment levels were identified as potential mechanisms of stress tolerance, although these responses did not fully prevent yield losses. Principal component analysis explained 75.42% of the total variation, revealing negative correlations between yield-related traits, including grain number, and grain weight. In contrast, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and proline contents were positively correlated with the first principal component. These results highlighted the importance of understanding genotype differences in the LSF tolerance. The genotype- and stage-dependent physiological adjustments drive contrasting yield responses, thereby supporting targeted selection for improved cold resilience under late spring frost conditions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Functional Plant Biology, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Plant Science
Plant ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences