Journal of Computational Dynamics· 2014
On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications
- 1,460citations
- 2014year
Short summary
A new theoretical framework generalizes Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) to analyze nonsequential time series and rank-deficient datasets, improving computational efficiency and noise mitigation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- DMD is redefined as the eigendecomposition of an approximating linear operator, generalizing its theory.
- The framework accommodates nonsequential time series and rank-deficient datasets, previously unaddressed.
- Novel sampling strategies are introduced for enhanced computational efficiency and noise mitigation.
- The concept of linear consistency is presented to explain issues with rank-deficient data.
- Connections are strengthened between DMD, Koopman operator theory, eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA), and linear inverse modeling (LIM).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Originally introduced in the fluid mechanics community, dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing the dynamics of nonlinear systems. However, existing DMD theory deals primarily with sequential time series for which the measurement dimension is much larger than the number of measurements taken. We present a theoretical framework in which we define DMD as the eigendecomposition of an approximating linear operator. This generalizes DMD to a larger class of datasets, including nonsequential time series. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by presenting novel sampling strategies that increase computational efficiency and mitigate the effects of noise, respectively. We also introduce the concept of linear consistency, which helps explain the potential pitfalls of applying DMD to rank-deficient datasets, illustrating with examples. Such computations are not considered in the existing literature but can be understood using our more general framework. In addition, we show that our theory strengthens the connections between DMD and Koopman operator theory. It also establishes connections between DMD and other techniques, including the eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA), a system identification method, and linear inverse modeling (LIM), a method from climate science. We show that under certain conditions, DMD is equivalent to LIM.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Statistical and Nonlinear PhysicsPhysics and Astronomy