Perspectives on Behavior Science· 2026Q1
A Behavioral Economic Analysis of the Intention–Behavior Gap
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A behavioral-economic framework explains the intention-behavior gap as a lawful outcome of competing contingencies, where intention-inconsistent behavior is an impulsive choice driven by excessive discounting of future rewards and overvaluation of immediate ones.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The intention-behavior gap is framed as a functional outcome of competing contingencies, not a failure of intention.
- Intention-inconsistent behavior is conceptualized as an impulsive choice driven by a preference for smaller-sooner over larger-later reinforcers.
- Excessive discounting of future rewards and excessive valuation of immediate rewards are key behavioral processes underlying this impulsive choice.
- Preference reversal, a shift in preference as the time to reinforcement approaches, explains self-control failure despite strong intentions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The primary aim of this article is to provide a function-based, behavioral-economic account of the intention–behavior gap. Intentions, characterized as self-instructions, are best understood functionally as self-mands and instances of problem solving. When a stated intention, the verbal product of self-instructing behavior, fails to function as an effective discriminative stimulus for intention-consistent behavior, the intention-behavior gap emerges. This framework views the gap as a lawful outcome of competing contingencies involving a trade-off between smaller-sooner and larger-later reinforcers. In particular, from a behavioral economic perspective, intention-inconsistent behavior can be conceptualized as an impulsive choice, or a preference for a smaller-sooner reinforcer over a larger-later one. Two key behavioral processes underlie this impulsive choice: excessive discounting of the larger-later reinforcer and excessive valuation of the smaller-sooner reinforcer. Self-control failure despite strong intentions is best explained by preference reversal, or a shift in preference from the larger-later reinforcer to the smaller-sooner reinforcer as the time to reinforcement approaches. Viewing the intention–behavior gap as a result of preference reversal yields heuristics for rebalancing competing contingencies, informing prevention and intervention strategies that promote behavioral, rather than merely intentional, change across a wide range of public issues influenced by impulsive choice.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology