Information Communication & Society· 2026Q1
Claiming sociodigital futures? Knowledge practices and their consequences
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Claims about digital technologies and future societies are performative, shaping the very futures they describe, according to an analysis of institutional documents.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Claims about future digital societies are performative, influencing the futures they predict.
- Analysis of institutional documents shows a coherent ontological performance of 'digital,' 'social,' and 'future' relations.
- Knowledge practices are re-purposable across institutions despite differing interests.
- These practices provide a limited understanding of emerging futures and limit critical inquiry.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
There is currently intense and widespread speculation about the implications of digital technologies for future societies, despite a wealth of evidence that past claims to predict how technology will shape the future have usually failed. Nonetheless, it is now well established that claims to knowledge about how emerging technologies will shape future worlds are performative, exercising powerful effects on the futures they claim to describe. Building on the Sociology of Expectations and work on Sociotechnical Imaginaries, this paper turns attention to the ontological and epistemological ‘nuts’ and ‘bolts’ of claims about digital technologies, social life and the future. We ask: how are these entities and the relations between them constituted and given traction as knowledge practices? Specifically, we explore the practices used by major future-claiming institutional actors in a selection of published documents. We find a strikingly coherent ontological performance of the relations between ‘the digital’, ‘the social’ and ‘the future’ and the circulation of (what comes to count as) knowledge across these institutions. Indeed, what is striking is the re-purposability of these knowledge practices despite the distinctive institutional interests in play. These knowledge practices offer a limited grasp on the futures that are currently in the making. Moreover, they enable the persistence of a latent set of assumptions which are powerful in limiting consideration of critical questions about the future.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Information Communication & Society, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Social Sciences
General Social SciencesSocial Sciences