PofoliaShared via Pofolia

American Psychologist· 2021Q1

Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated.

NiCole T. Buchanan, Marisol Pérez, Mitchell J. Prinstein, Idia B. Thurston

Short summary

Psychological science currently upholds white supremacy through practices that homogenize BIPOC populations, segregate theories, apply disparate evaluation standards, and discourage BIPOC scholars, leading to persistent disparities in psychological outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Current scientific norms in psychology reinforce white supremacy by homogenizing BIPOC groups and applying unequal evaluation standards.
  • These practices contribute to persistent disparities in psychologically relevant outcomes like mental and physical health.
  • The article provides specific, actionable recommendations for stakeholders to address epistemic oppression.
  • Strategies for accountability and measuring progress are proposed to move beyond discussion to tangible action.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As efforts to end systemic racism gain momentum across various contexts, it is critical to consider antiracist steps needed to improve psychological science. Current scientific practices may serve to maintain white supremacy with significant and impactful consequences. Extant research practices reinforce norms of homogeneity within BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color) populations, segregate theories, and methods derived from BIPOC groups, apply disparate standards to the evaluation of research on white versus BIPOC populations, and discourage BIPOC scholars from pursuing research careers. Perhaps consequently, disparities persist on a range of psychologically relevant outcomes (e.g., mental and physical health). This article presents examples of how epistemic oppression exists within psychological science, including in how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. This article offers a needed contribution by providing specific concrete recommendations for different stakeholders, including those involved in the production, reporting, and gatekeeping of science as well as consumers of science. Additionally, a discussion of accountability steps are offered to ensure that psychological science moves beyond talk and toward action, with possible strategies to measure outcomes, stimulate progress, promote dialogue and action, challenge inequity, and upend the influence of white supremacy in psychological science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. American Psychologist, 2021 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Psychology

General PsychologyPsychology