PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS ONE· 2026Q1

Novel peritoneal catheters with silver particles lower rates of peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites

Sarah Lisa Schütte, Benjamin Heidrich, Heiner H. Wedemeyer, Benjamin Maasoumy et al.

Short summary

Silver-particle embedded peritoneal catheters (sPeCa) significantly reduced peritonitis (HR 0.34), device explantation (HR 0.39), and rehospitalization (HR 0.52) compared to conventional catheters in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Silver-particle embedded peritoneal catheters (sPeCa) showed a 72% lower incidence of peritonitis compared to conventional catheters (HR 0.28, p=0.002).
  • sPeCa were associated with significantly reduced device explantation (HR 0.37, p=0.03) and rehospitalization (HR 0.48, p=0.02).
  • After propensity-score matching, sPeCa patients still had significantly less peritonitis (HR 0.34, p=0.008), explantation (HR 0.39, p=0.04), and rehospitalization (HR 0.52, p=0.046).
  • Mortality rates were comparable between sPeCa and conventional catheters (HR 1.66, p=0.29).
  • sPeCa demonstrated similar peritonitis and explantation rates to ascites pumps, but with significantly lower rehospitalization rates (HR 2.83 for ascites pump, p=0.02).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background Treatment options for refractory ascites (RA) in cirrhosis are scarce. When TIPS insertion is contraindicated, tunneled peritoneal catheters (cPeCa) offer an alternative treatment. However, cPeCa are associated with high incidences of infection-related complications. Novel PeCa embedded with silver particles (sPeCa) have been introduced to address this issue. Methods We evaluated all patients with cirrhosis and RA treated with PeCa or ascites pump at Hannover Medical School from 2012–2023. Analysis was conducted utilizing a multivariable Competing-Risk-Analysis and afterwards a 3:1-Propensity-Score-Matching (PSM) to adjust for potential differences. Last, sPeCa-patients were compared to those with ascites pump. Study endpoints were mortality, peritonitis, device explantation and rehospitalization. Results 150 patients with cPeCa were compared to 27 sPeCa-patients. Treatment with sPeCa was associated with significantly reduced incidences of peritonitis (HR 0.28, p = 0.002), device explantation (HR 0.37, p = 0.03) and rehospitalization (HR 0.48, p = 0.02). After PSM, 81 cPeCa-patients were compared to 27 sPeCa-patients. Mortality was comparable (HR 1.66, p = 0.29). Patients with sPeCa experienced less peritonitis (HR 0.34, p = 0.008), explantation (HR 0.39, p = 0.04) and rehospitalization (HR 0.52, p = 0.046). When compared to ascites-pump, sPeCa-patients demonstrated similar rates of mortality (HR 0.95, p = 0.94), peritonitis (HR 0.97, p = 0.96) and explantation (HR 0.89, p = 0.88), while rehospitalization rate was significantly higher in ascites pump (HR 2.83, p = 0.02). Conclusion Treatment with sPeCa is associated with less infection-associated complications and could therefore be a superior therapeutic approach compared to cPeCa.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hepatology

HepatologyMedicine