npj Digital Medicine· 2026Q1
AI-assisted telerehabilitation in early Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, randomized, multi-arm comparative trial
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
An AI-assisted telerehabilitation program did not significantly improve motor symptoms in early Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after 1-3 months, but a 3-month intervention showed a higher proportion of patients reaching an exploratory cognitive improvement threshold compared to a 1-month intervention.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- AI-assisted telerehabilitation for early Parkinson's disease (PD) did not significantly improve motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS Part III) across 1, 2, or 3-month intervention durations.
- A post-hoc analysis suggested that the 3-month intervention group had a higher proportion of patients reaching an exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared to the 1-month group.
- Exploratory correlations between cognitive and motor improvements were weak and not statistically significant after correction.
- No falls or adverse events were recorded during the trial.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This exploratory, multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, multi-arm comparative trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and exploratory clinical signals of an AI-facilitated telerehabilitation system across different intervention durations in early-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD). One-hundred and twenty PD patients (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤2.5) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into short-term (1 month), medium-term (2 months), and long-term (3 months) training groups (15–30 min, 5 days/week). The primary outcome was the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included change in cognition, mood, gait parameters, activity of daily living, and safety. Final analysis included 71 participants. No significant differences were observed between groups for the primary motor outcome at 3 months. Post hoc responder analysis showed that the 3-month group had higher proportions reaching the exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared with the 1-month group. Exploratory correlations between MoCA changes and motor parameter changes were weak and did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. No falls or adverse events were recorded throughout the trial. Because the primary endpoint was negative, attrition was high, no usual-care control was included, and the cognitive finding was limited to an exploratory post-hoc responder analysis, these findings do not permit causal inference and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, requiring further validation in larger, prespecified multi-arm comparative trials (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Number: ChiCTR2500108323).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. npj Digital Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Neurology (Medicine)
NeurologyMedicine