PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Molecular Sciences· 2025Q1

Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models

Barbara Ziemba

Short summary

Cytotoxicity testing has evolved from basic colorimetric assays (MTT, LDH, NRU) to multiparametric methods (high-content imaging, flow cytometry, impedance analysis) and sophisticated in silico models (QSAR, ML, PBPK), enabling quantitative in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Classical cytotoxicity assays (MTT, LDH, NRU) are being supplemented by multiparametric methods (high-content imaging, flow cytometry, impedance analysis).
  • In silico models (QSAR, ML, PBPK) are enabling quantitative in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE).
  • Integration of computational models with 3D organoids and organ-on-chip systems enhances cross-validation and translational accuracy.
  • These advancements support New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for predictive, mechanism-anchored frameworks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Cytotoxicity testing remains a cornerstone of modern toxicology, providing critical insight into how chemicals and drugs affect cell viability and function. Classical colorimetric assays such as MTT, LDH release, and neutral red uptake established the methodological basis of in vitro toxicology and continue to serve as regulatory benchmarks. However, their limited mechanistic depth and physiological relevance have prompted the field to evolve towards more predictive and human-centred approaches. Recent advances in high-content imaging, flow cytometry, and real-time impedance analysis have transformed cytotoxicity testing into a multiparametric discipline capable of detecting adaptive and sub-lethal cellular responses. Parallel progress in computational toxicology has introduced in silico models-QSAR, machine learning, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling-that enable quantitative in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE). The integration of these computational tools with 3D organoids, organ-on-chip systems, and stem cell-based models allows for cross-validation between predictive simulations and experimental evidence, enhancing mechanistic interpretation and translational accuracy. Together, these developments underpin New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA), marking the transition from descriptive assays to predictive, mechanism-anchored frameworks that bridge in silico prediction with in vitro and in vivo validation-advancing both biomedical research and regulatory toxicology.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Small AnimalsVeterinary