Frontiers in Psychology· 2019Q1
The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases
- 796citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
Published psychological effect sizes are significantly inflated (median r=.36) compared to pre-registered studies (median r=.16) due to biases like publication bias, rendering conventional interpretation benchmarks unreliable.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
TakeawaysIn the app
Key pointsIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology