Journal of Manufacturing Systems· 2026Q1
FJSP-E2E: A process-verified framework for automatic scheduling-model reconfiguration in smart manufacturing
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
FJSP-E2E, a new framework with 72 expert-audited samples, verifies automatic reconfiguration of flexible job-shop scheduling models by checking manufacturing process diagnostic fields, not just final makespan.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- FJSP-E2E framework uses 72 expert-audited samples for automatic flexible job-shop scheduling (FJSP) model reconfiguration.
- Verification includes manufacturing process diagnostic fields, exposing constraint omissions missed by objective-value checking alone.
- LLM performance varies significantly, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 achieving a 93.1% few-shot pass rate.
- Supervised fine-tuning of Qwen3-8B on synthetic data yielded only a 4.2% pass rate.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
In smart manufacturing systems, scheduling models must be continuously reconfigured in response to machine failures, process changes, worker availability, tool constraints, AGV logistics, maintenance windows, and quality risks. Large language models (LLMs) provide a natural-language interface for translating shop-floor updates into executable scheduling models, but final objective-value checking is insufficient: an LLM may omit tool, worker, transport, or calendar constraints while still obtaining an accidentally correct makespan on a particular instance. This paper proposes FJSP-E2E, a process-aware framework and benchmark for automatic flexible job-shop scheduling (FJSP) model reconfiguration. FJSP-E2E contains 72 expert-audited diagnostic samples organized into three levels, from explicit instance edits to structural CP-SAT extensions and expert-language compositional reconfiguration. Each sample requires executable Python code and reports both solver results and manufacturing process diagnostic fields. These fields are structural proxies rather than complete formal verification of the CP-SAT constraint graph, but they expose omissions that objective-value checking alone may miss. Experiments on representative LLMs show large differences in deployment readiness: Claude Sonnet 4.5 reaches a 93.1% few-shot pass rate, whereas the weakest model reaches 9.7%, and supervised fine-tuning Qwen3-8B on 4500 synthetic samples improves its pass rate only to 4.2%. The results reveal manufacturing-specific bottlenecks in route choice, AGV transport, worker-resource coupling, and implicit shop-floor language, indicating that reliable LLM-based modeling assistants require process-aware verification rather than answer-only evaluation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringEngineering