PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol on the novel oxygenation index and respiratory mechanics in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Meining Zhang, Shiwei Huang, Shaodan Xu, Jiayi Zhang et al.

Short summary

Sevoflurane improved a novel oxygenation index (NOI) and lung mechanics more than propofol during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Sevoflurane resulted in a significantly lower novel oxygenation index (NOI) compared to propofol at 5, 30, and 60 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (e.g., 1.98 ± 0.21 vs. 2.11 ± 0.24 at 5 min, P = 0.003).
  • Patients under sevoflurane had significantly higher lung compliance (e.g., 34.35 ± 2.26 vs. 31.31 ± 1.35 at 5 min, P < 0.0001) and lower dead space, driving pressure, and peak airway pressure.
  • Sevoflurane group showed significantly lower opioid consumption (P < 0.0001) and VAS pain scores (P < 0.0001) post-operatively.
  • The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher in the sevoflurane group (P = 0.003 in PACU, P = 0.022 at 24h).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The novel oxygenation index (NOI), which incorporates mean airway pressure (Pmean) as a key respiratory parameter, is increasingly being investigated for its enhanced ability to reflect patients’ pulmonary function compared to the traditional oxygenation index (OI). This study aimed to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the NOI in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. A total of 120 female patients aged 18–45 years scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane (group sevoflurane [GS]) or propofol (group propofol [GP]). The primary outcome was the NOI, calculated as [(FiO₂ × Pmean)/PaO₂] ×100, with lower values indicating a more favorable status. Secondary outcomes included the ratio of physiologic dead-space over tidal volume [Vd/Vt (%)], lung compliance (LC), driving pressure (ΔP), peak airway pressure (PIP), and mean airway pressure (Pmean). In addition, the total consumption of opioids from patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were also recorded and analyzed. The NOI was significantly lower in the GS than in the GP at 5 min (T2), 30 min (T3), and 60 min (T4) after pneumoperitoneum establishment in the Trendelenburg position (T2: 1.98 ± 0.21 vs. 2.11 ± 0.24, P = 0.003; T3: 2.38 ± 0.24 vs. 2.52 ± 0.31, P = 0.008; T4: 2.59 ± 0.24 vs. 2.92 ± 0.32, P < 0.0001). Patients in the GS had significantly higher LC than those in the GP at the same three time points (T2: 34.35 ± 2.26 vs. 31.31 ± 1.35, P < 0.0001; T3: 30.70 ± 1.40 vs. 28.30 ± 1.37, P < 0.0001; T4: 29.49 ± 1.33 vs. 27.81 ± 1.38, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the Vd/Vt (%), ΔP, PIP, and Pmean were significantly higher in the GP than those in the GS. The total consumption of opioids within 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the GS than in the GP ( P < 0.0001). Additionally, the VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the GS than that in the GP at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) ( P < 0.0001) and at 24 h postoperatively ( P < 0.0001). The incidence of PONV in the GS was significantly higher than in the GP both in the PACU ( P = 0.003) and at 24 h postoperatively ( P = 0.022). The NOI was progressively increased following the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position. However, patients in the GS maintained a superior NOI compared with those in the GP. Trial registration : The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ChiCTR2200065644 date of registration 10/11/2022).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine