PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of International Relations and Development· 2026Q1

The development finance regime complex and crisis response: a comparative perspective of multilateral development banks’ response to COVID-19

Doron Ella

Short summary

Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) with higher hierarchical positions in the development finance complex were more likely to scale up lending and expand operational scope during the COVID-19 crisis, while lower-positioned MDBs adopted cautious strategies and relied on cooperation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • MDB crisis response to COVID-19 varied based on hierarchical position, not solely institutional capacity.
  • Higher-ranked MDBs were more likely to scale up lending, use fast-track facilities, and expand operational scope.
  • Lower-ranked MDBs adopted cautious strategies and relied on cooperation with established MDBs.
  • Hierarchy conditions competition and coordination among MDBs during fast-moving crises.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article explains variation in multilateral development banks’ (MDBs) crisis-response policies during the COVID-19 crisis. Drawing on a focused, structured comparison of 22 MDBs, this study analyzes five crisis-response policies: investment scale-ups and resource repurposing; institutional restructuring; fast-track facilities and procedures; policy and scope expansions; and inter-institutional collaboration and orchestration. It argues that MDBs’ crisis responses were shaped not only by institutional capacity but also by competitive pressures and hierarchical positioning within the development finance regime complex. MDBs occupying higher positions in the hierarchy demonstrated greater flexibility and were more likely to scale up lending, introduce expedited procedures, and expand operational scope, while lower-positioned MDBs adopted more cautious strategies and relied more heavily on cooperation with established MDBs. The analysis shows that some of this variation takes the form of patterned convergence in policy choices within hierarchical tiers and benchmarking practices across them, suggesting that hierarchy conditions both competition and coordination among MDBs during fast-moving crises and helps explain variation in countercyclical responses.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of International Relations and Development, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Development

DevelopmentSocial Sciences