PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Educational Psychologist· 2012Q1

Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed

David S. Yeager, Carol S. Dweck

Short summary

Students who believe their personal characteristics, like intelligence and social attributes, can be developed (growth mindset) show higher academic achievement and lower aggression compared to those with fixed beliefs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Belief in the developability of intellectual abilities correlates with higher achievement across school transitions.
  • Growth mindsets in math courses are linked to greater course completion rates.
  • Belief in the developability of social attributes reduces adolescent aggression and stress from peer victimization.
  • Mindset interventions are effective in promoting resilience in educational contexts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Because challenges are ubiquitous, resilience is essential for success in school and in life. In this article we review research demonstrating the impact of students' mindsets on their resilience in the face of academic and social challenges. We show that students who believe (or are taught) that intellectual abilities are qualities that can be developed (as opposed to qualities that are fixed) tend to show higher achievement across challenging school transitions and greater course completion rates in challenging math courses. New research also shows that believing (or being taught) that social attributes can be developed can lower adolescents' aggression and stress in response to peer victimization or exclusion, and result in enhanced school performance. We conclude by discussing why psychological interventions that change students' mindsets are effective and what educators can do to foster these mindsets and create resilience in educational settings. Notes Of interest, research also shows it is possible within a given domain for a person to have an even more specific implicit theory. For instance, Good, Rattan, and Dweck (Citation2012) and Rattan, Good, and Dweck (Citation2012) examined implicit theories about math ability rather than general theories about intelligence. Beer (Citation2002) investigated implicit theories about shyness rather than general theories about personality. An important area for future research will be to document the relative advantages for educational practice of intervening to change a more general implicit theory versus a more specific one. TABLE 1 Academic Mindsets, for Those With More of an Entity Versus Incremental Implicit Theory of Intelligence Download CSVDisplay Table

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Educational Psychologist, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Psychology

Clinical PsychologyPsychology