PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Periodontology· 2026Q1

New periodontal phenotype classification in patients with different types of malocclusion and dental crowding

Abeer A. Al‐Sosowa, Ehab A Abdulghani, Wang Meng, Jiajun Zhu et al.

Short summary

A new cluster-based classification reveals that anterior periodontal phenotype is significantly associated with sagittal (Class III) and hypodivergent skeletal patterns, but not with dental crowding severity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A new periodontal phenotype classification was applied to 180 participants, evaluating gingival thickness, alveolar bone thickness, and keratinized tissue width.
  • Periodontal phenotype distribution was significantly associated with sagittal skeletal classification (Class III) and vertical skeletal patterns (hypodivergent).
  • Class III and hypodivergent groups were more commonly found in thin periodontal phenotype clusters.
  • Dental crowding severity did not show a significant correlation with periodontal phenotype.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background The periodontal phenotype plays a critical role in periodontal stability and orthodontic risk assessment. However, an integrated evaluation of soft‐ and hard‐tissue periodontal characteristics across various sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and dental crowding remains limited. This study applied an innovative cluster‐based classification of periodontal phenotype to evaluate these variances. Methods This cross‐sectional study included 180 participants and 1080 maxillary anterior teeth. Using superimposed cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scan data, the thickness of the gingiva (GT) and the thickness of the alveolar bone (ABT) was evaluated. The keratinized tissue width (KTW) was obtained from intraoral images utilizing a correction factor. Subjects were classified by sagittal skeletal classification, vertical skeletal patterns, and crowding severity. Periodontal phenotype clusters were assigned using a previously developed classification framework. Statistical analyses included chi‐square tests with Monte Carlo simulation for categorical comparisons and multinomial logistic regression to assess associations between cluster membership and potential covariates. Results The distribution of periodontal phenotype clusters was significantly associated with the sagittal skeletal classification and vertical skeletal patterns, with Class III and hypodivergent groups being more commonly found in thin or majority‐thin clusters. While the dental crowding severity showed no significant correlation with periodontal phenotype. Conclusions The anterior periodontal phenotype is not randomly distributed but rather reflects sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and is independent of tooth alignment and crowding severity. Class III and hypodivergent patterns are more commonly associated not only with reduced GT but also with narrow KTW and reduced ABT, which highlights the importance of phenotype‐guided risk assessment in orthodontic planning.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Periodontology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Orthodontics

OrthodonticsDentistry